Table 1.
Summary of samples from Late Neolithic contexts at the Xagħra circle
| Sample ID | Date BC | Genomic sex | Endogenous DNA (%) | Genome coverage | mtDNA HG | Y-chr HG | X-chr contamination estimate (%) | mtDNA contamination estimate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xaghra1 | 2575–2520 | Female | 1.9 | 0.05 | – | – | – | – |
| Xaghra2 | 2550–2350 | Unknown | 0.06 | <0.01 | – | – | – | – |
| Xaghra3 | 2550–2350 | Male | 0.42 | <0.01 | – | – | – | – |
| Xaghra4 | 2535–2475 | Female | 1.7 | 0.03 | – | – | – | – |
| Xaghra5 | 2550–2350 | Male | 37 | 1.24 | K1a | H2 | 0.6 (0.27) | 0.533 (0.14) |
| Xaghra6 | 2900–2750 | Female | 12 | 0.98 | V | – | – | 0.787 (0.11) |
| Xaghra7 | 2875–2615 | Female | 0.16 | <0.01 | – | – | – | – |
| Xaghra8 | 2575–2470 | Female | 0.03 | <0.01 | – | – | – | – |
| Xaghra9 | 2530–2400 | Male | 15 | 7.52 | H4a1 | G2a2a1a3 | 1.1 (0.33) | 0.340 (0.13) |
Date ranges have been estimated using the 95% CI of Bayesian chronological models.7 Uniparental haplogroups and mtDNA contamination estimates were reported in Ariano et al.11 95% confidence intervals are reported in parenthesis for contamination levels. See also STAR Methods.