Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul;12(7):3917–3931. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-791

Table 3. Quantitative results for the classification models when evaluating the external test dataset for classification (Hong Kong hospitals dataset).

Bone suppression of external test data None Gusarev Rajaraman
COVID-Net CXR2
   Sensitivity (%) 80.93 77.81 71.25
   Specificity (%) 56.18 60.42 67.95
   NPV (%) 82.67 81.51 79.28
   Accuracy (%) 65.63 67.06 69.21
   AUC ± SE95% 0.686±0.031 0.691±0.031 0.696±0.032
VGG16-Modified
   Sensitivity (%) 52.81 61.88 61.88
   Specificity (%) 86.87 78.76 84.56
   NPV (%) 74.88 76.98 78.21
   Accuracy (%) 73.87 72.32 75.90
   AUC ± SE95% 0.698±0.031 0.703±0.032 0.732±0.031*

For the COVID-Net CXR2 architecture, the same model was tested with non-suppressed, Gusarev-suppressed and Rajaraman-suppressed external testing data. For the VGG16-Modified architecture, separate models trained on non-suppressed, Gusarev-suppressed and Rajaraman-suppressed data were each tested with their correspondingly suppressed external test data (e.g., non-suppressed training data model with non-suppressed test data). *, denotes a significant (P<0.05) difference from the non-suppressed external test data. NPV, negative predictive value; AUC, area under the receiver operating curve; SE95%, the error associated with a 95% confidence interval.