Skip to main content
. 2022 May-Jun;38(5):1292–1297. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.5.4820

Table IV.

Comparative analysis of ADL scores between the two groups after treatment (χ¯±S) n=30.

Group Grade I Grade II Grade III Grade IV Grade V Total excellent and good rate (%)
Experimental group 4 7 10 7 2 21 (70%)
Control group 3 4 6 14 3 13 (43.3%)
χ2 4.34
p 0.04

p<0.05.