Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 1;23:233. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02858-9

Table 3.

Association between the obesity, MetS and BMI-MetS categories with the CKD by logistic regression models

Number Model I Model II
Male/ Female OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Male Female Male Female
BMI
 Normal weight 1694/1156 Ref - Ref -
 Overweight &Obese 2947/3867 0.98 (0.74, 1.29) 0.90 (0.60, 1.05) 1.10 (0.78, 1.43) 0.93 (0.77, 1.12)
MetS
 No 3363/3108 Ref - Ref -
 Yes 1334/1949 1.88 (1.43, 2.45) 1.48 (1.27, 1.73) 1.48 (1.10, 2.01) -1.14 (0.95, 1.31)
Obesity phenotypes
 MHNO 2584/2133 Ref - Ref -
 MHO 345/957 0.81 (0.43, 1.52) 0.71 (0.56, 0.89) 0.95 (0.49, 1.83) 0.95 (0.74, 1.20)
 MUNO 1334/1104 1.70 (1.26, 2.28) 1.51 (1.26, 1.82) 1.54 (1.12, 2.11) 1.31 (1.10, 1.60)
 MUO 438/867 2.20 (1.48, 3.27) 1.16 (0.93, 1.42) 2.22 (1.44, 3.41) 1.23 (1.01, 1.54)

Model I: Unadjusted; Model II: Adjusted for age, SES, physical activity, smoking, alcohol use, sodium intake, CVD, GGT, ALT, AST

MHNO Metabolically healthy non-obese, MHO Metabolically healthy obese, MUNO Metabolically unhealthy non-obese, MUO Metabolically unhealthy obese