Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 1;21:208. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04232-4

Table 2.

Treatment-Location comparisons within An. gambiae s.l. strain and host (present or absent) from a Beta-binomial Distribution model

Host Comparison Odds ratio (95% bonferroni adjusted confidence interval); bonferroni adjusted P-value
Kisumu (IS) N’gousso (IS) Banfora (IR) VK7 (IR)
Absent OS flight/cone vs P2 flight/cone 3.07 (2.94, 3.21); < 0.0001* 3.71 (3.55, 3.87); < 0.0001* 2.92 (2.73, 3.13); < 0.0001* 0.59 (0.53, 0.65); < 0.0001*
OS flight/cone vs UT flight/cone 3.06 (2.90, 3.23); < 0.0001* 7.33 (7.03, 7.65); < 0.0001* 3.17 (2.95, 3.41); < 0.0001* 1.72 (1.61, 1.83); < 0.0001*
OS net vs P2 Net 0.33 (0.31, 0.34); < 0.0001* 0.27 (0.26, 0.28); < 0.0001* 0.34 (0.32, 0.37); < 0.0001* 1.71 (1.53, 1.90); < 0.0001*
OS net vs UT Net 0.33 (0.31, 0.35); < 0.0001* 0.14 (0.13, 0.14); < 0.0001* 0.32 (0.29, 0.34); < 0.0001* 0.58 (0.55, 0.62); < 0.0001*
P2 net vs UT Net 1.00 (0.96, 1.05); 1.0000 0.51 (0.48, 0.53); < 0.0001* 0.92 (0.88, 0.96); < 0.0001* 0.34 (0.31, 0.38); < 0.0001*
Present OS flight/cone vs P2 flight/cone 1.21 (1.14, 1.29); < 0.0001* 3.05 (2.89, 3.22); < 0.0001* 1.40 (1.33, 1.46); < 0.0001* 1.78 (1.70, 1.85); < 0.0001*
OS flight/cone vs UT flight/Cone 1.14 (1.09, 1.19); < 0.0001* 3.34 (3.04, 3.66); < 0.0001* 1.08 (1.03, 1.14); < 0.0001* 2.64 (2.52, 2.76); < 0.0001*
OS net vs P2 Net 0.82 (0.78, 0.87); < 0.0001* 0.33 (0.31, 0.35); < 0.0001* 0.72 (0.68, 0.75); < 0.0001* 0.56 (0.54, 0.59); < 0.0001*
OS net vs UT Net 0.88 (0.84, 0.92); < 0.0001* 0.30 (0.27, 0.33); < 0.0001* 0.92 (0.88, 0.97); < 0.0001* 0.38 (0.36, 0.40); < 0.0001*
P2 net vs UT Net 1.07 (1.01, 1.13); 0.0061* 0.91 (0.84, 0.99); 0.0222* 1.29 (1.23, 1.36); < 0.0001* 0.67 (0.65, 0.70); < 0.0001*

Multiple pairwise comparisons 95% Confidence Intervals and P-values corrected using the Bonferroni adjustment

IS insecticide susceptible, IR insecticide resistant, UT untreated net, OS olyset net, P2 PermaNet 2.0 net

*Significant at 5% significance level