Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 17;9:940673. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.940673

TABLE 3.

Serum biochemical parameter tests at termination.

TG
(mmol/L)
TCHO
(mmol/L)
LDL-C
(mmol/L)
HDL-C
(mmol/L)
FPG
(mmol/L)
FINS
(mU/L)
HOMA-IR
CON-S 0.49 ± 0.06 3.32 ± 0.36 1.29 ± 0.23 2.66 ± 0.88 4.32 ± 0.59 15.37 ± 2.21 2.94 ± 0.53
CON-PA1 0.44 ± 0.04 3.13 ± 0.26 1.15 ± 0.16 2.89 ± 0.37 3.67 ± 0.60 14.34 ± 2.26 2.33 ± 0.49
CON-PA2 0.31 ± 0.04 3.01 ± 0.19* 1.02 ± 0.14* 3.41 ± 0.72* 3.65 ± 0.63 17.00 ± 3.20 2.81 ± 0.86
HFD-S 0.60 ± 0.07* 4.23 ± 0.31* 1.73 ± 0.27* 2.56 ± 0.08 5.73 ± 0.64** 19.48 ± 1.25** 4.95 ± 0.43**
HFD-PA1 0.43 ± 0.08 3.99 ± 0.33 1.62 ± 0.15 2.74 ± 0.47 4.35 ± 0.63## 18.63 ± 1.33## 3.60 ± 0.60##
HFD-PA2 0.38 ± 0.07# 3.67 ± 0.14# 1.46 ± 0.09 3.38 ± 0.52# 4.10 ± 0.80##Δ 15.79 ± 3.12## 2.79 ± 0.20##ΔΔ

TG, triglyceride; TCHO, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; FINS, fasting serum insulin; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance. Compared with the CON-S group, *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01; compared with the HFD-S group, #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01; comparison between exercise groups (CON-PA1 vs. CON-PA2, HFD-PA1 vs. HFD-PA2), ΔP < 0.05 and ΔΔP < 0.01.