Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomark Neuropsychiatry. 2021 Oct 2;5:100043. doi: 10.1016/j.bionps.2021.100043
ACC 2DJ Independent Variable CTQ Total Score CTQ EAS

NAA/Glx Depressed Group, n = 22 Depressed Group, n = 22 Combined Sample, n = 39
Co-vary β p-value β p-value β p-value
None −0.006 0.012 −0.017 0.004 −0.009 0.063
Age −0.006 0.012 −0.017 0.004 −0.009 0.072
Sex −0.006 0.012 −0.017 0.003 −0.009 0.058
CDRS-R −0.006 0.021 −0.018 0.007 −0.014 0.027


ACC 2DJ Independent Variable CTQ Total Score CTQ EAS

Glx Depressed Group, n = 22 Depressed Group, n = 22
Co-vary β p-value β p-value
None 0.738 0.05 2.014 0.034
Age 0.732 0.053 2.061 0.036
Sex 0.712 0.051 2.222 0.017
CDRS-R 0.828 0.046 2.352 0.026


ACC 2DJ Independent Variable CTQ ENS CTQ PNS

NAA Healthy Group, n = 17 Combined Sample, n = 39
Co-vary β p-value β p-value
None −2.016 0.029 −1.092 0.03
Age −1.814 0.064 −1.17 0.019
Sex −2.016 0.028 −0.973 0.05
CDRS-R −2.544 0.014 −0.683 0.196

Note: Each β and p-value pair represents the coefficient and p-value of CTQ score from a separate generalized linear model. EAS, Emotional Abuse Subscale; ENS, Emotional Neglect Subscale; PAS, Physical Abuse Subscale; PNS, Physical Neglect Subscale; SAS, Sexual Abuse Subscale.