Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 29;22(2):27. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5960

Table 2.

Summary of study outcomes.


QUANTITATIVE STUDIES

STUDY PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES RESULTS SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES FINDINGS

Aftab et al., (2018) (1) Diabetes control Significant reduction diabetes in control (p = .03)
General health status Significant reduction on the mental subscale of the SF-36 from baseline to 60-week follow-up (p = .02)
Serious mental illness symptoms No significant reduction in depression or psychopathology
Functioning Significant reduction in functioning (p = .037). No significant reduction in disability

Chwastiak et al., (2018) (2) Diabetes control Improved diabetes control from baseline to 3-month follow-up (p = .049)
BMI Reduced BMI from baseline to 3-month follow-up (p = .04)
Serious mental illness symptoms No significant changes in measures of psychiatric symptoms

McKibbin et al., (2010) (3) Diabetes control
General health status
No significant change in diabetes control
No significant change in BMI
Adverse events 2 participants did not complete the follow-up assessment due to inpatient hospitalisation
Significant reduction on the physical symptoms subscale of the SF-12 from baseline to 16-week follow-up (p = .05).
Serious mental illness symptoms No significant change on the mental health subscale.
Significant reduction in depression symptoms from baseline to 16-week follow-up (p = .01). No significant change in measures of psychiatric symptom severity
Significant improvement in functioning from baseline to 16-week follow-up (p = .01). No significant reduction in disability rating (p = .06)
Functioning

Sajatovic et al., (2011) (4) Diabetes control No significant change in diabetes control
General health status No significant change in general health status or BMI
Serious mental illness symptoms Significant reduction in depression (p = .01) and psychopathy (p = .01) at 16-week follow-up. No significant change in psychiatric symptom severity
Functioning Significant reduction in functioning (p = .01) and no significant reduction in disability (p = .06)

Sajatovic et al., (2017) (5) Diabetes control No significant change in diabetes control Adverse events 119 adverse events among 74 participants. Adverse events occurred among 6 peer educators, 30 participants receiving treatment as usual, and 38 TTIM participants.
There were three deaths (TTIM, n = 2; treatment as usual, n = 1).
General health status No significant change in general health status or BMI
Serious mental illness symptoms Significant reduction in psychopathy (p < 001) and depression (p = .016) from baseline to 60-week follow-up. No significant reduction in psychiatric symptom severity.
Functioning No significant reduction in disability ratings. Significant reduction in disability from baseline to 60-week follow-up (p = .003)

QUALITATIVE STUDIES

STUDY THEMES FINDINGS SECONDARY OUTCOMES FINDINGS

Blixen et al., (2014) (6) Positive group experience Delivering the intervention increased peer educators’ confidence and created group cohesiveness
Success with learning the manual Peer educators had a positive experience learning the training manual content
Increased knowledge of T2D/SMI Peer educators developed a greater understanding of their health conditions
Improved self-management of T2D/SMI Becoming a peer educator increased awareness of the importance of effective self-management
Increased self-confidence Becoming a peer educator increased confidence in knowing their role and supporting group members
United in purpose All group members had the same goal

Lawless et al., (2016) (7) Disseminating health information Good attendance from study participants
Positive experience delivering the intervention
Participant attendance 80 (80%) participants attended at least one session, 49 (61%) completed all 12 sessions
Facilitating group processes Nurse educators encouraged the development of a therapeutic environment Adverse events Peer educators’ illness severity, participants’ symptoms impacting some group interactions
Minimising logistical barriers Peer educators used effective modelling strategies
Nurse educators used various strategies to overcome logistical barriers encourage attendance
Coordinating interdisciplinary communication Nurse educators provided care-linkage to enhance communication between participants’ healthcare providers

Key: BMI = Body Mass Index; TTIM = Targeted Training in Illness Management.