Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 16;9:914020. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.914020

TABLE 3.

Association between the percentage of body fat and all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazard regression.

<60 years
P for trend ≥60 years
P for trend
T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3
Female
Unadjusted model 1 0.81 (0.56, 1.16) 0.70 (0.47, 1.03) 0.176 1 0.83 (0.56, 1.22) 0.72 (0.50, 1.05) 0.232
Model Ab 1 0.83 (0.57, 1.20) 0.67 (0.45,1.00) 0.144 1 0.94 (0.63, 1.39) 0.82 (0.56, 1.21) 0.583
Model Bb 1 1.03 (0.70, 1.51) 0.81 (0.54, 1.23) 0.496 1 1.05 (0.70, 1.59) 0.95 (0.63, 1.42) 0.855
Model Cb 1 1.07 (0.68, 1.69) 0.88 (0.53, 1.46) 0.746 1 1.22 (0.77, 1.93) 1.07 (0.67, 1.70) 0.695
Model Db 1 0.93 (0.53, 1.64) 0.65 (0.33, 1.28) 0.451 1 1.94 (1.01, 3.73) 0.86 (0.43, 1.72) 0.027
Male
Unadjusted model 1 0.83 (0.58, 1.18) 0.88 (0.61, 1.27) 0.563 1 0.61 (0.45, 0.83) 0.68 (0.51, 0.91) 0.003
Model Ab 1 0.84 (0.59, 1.20) 0.88 (0.61, 1.28) 0.608 1 0.61 (0.45, 0.83) 0.64 (0.48, 0.86) 0.002
Model Bb 1 0.85 (0.60, 1.23) 0.97 (0.66, 1.41) 0.673 1 0.59 (0.43, 0.81) 0.62 (0.46, 0.85) 0.001
Model Cb 1 0.75 (0.48, 1.18) 0.96 (0.61, 1.50) 0.431 1 0.70 (0.49, 1.01) 0.70 (0.49, 1.00) 0.082
Model Db 1 0.89 (0.50, 1.61) 1.21 (0.69, 2.10) 0.595 1 0.83 (0.52, 1.33) 0.91 (0.57, 1.44) 0.745

aValues are models adjusted HR and 95% confidence interval, ranges for tertiles (T) 1 through 3. Linear trends (p for trend) were obtained with the percentage of body fat as continuous variables.

bModel A: adjusted for age, education, smoking, alcohol drinking, family history of cancer, version of Body Composition Analyzer; Model B: as model A and additionally adjusted for Karnofsky performance scores, duration of hospital stays, NRS 2002 score, nutrition support, and handgrip strength; Model C: as Model B and additionally adjusted for commodities, previous treatments, cancer types, TNM stages, and quality of life; Model D: as Model C and additionally adjusted C-reaction protein.