Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 16;9:914020. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.914020

TABLE 4.

Association between fat mass and all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazard regression.

<60 years
P for trend ≥60 years
P for trend
T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3
Female
Unadjusted model 1 0.62 (0.42, 0.90) 0.62 (0.42, 0.90) 0.012 1 0.89 (0.61, 1.30) 0.74 (0.50, 1.08) 0.276
Model Ab 1 0.62 (0.42, 0.90) 0.61 (0.41, 0.89) 0.010 1 1.01 (0.69, 1.49) 0.88 (0.59, 1.30) 0.725
Model Bb 1 0.74 (0.50, 1.10) 0.74 (0.49, 1.11) 0.217 1 1.23 (0.81, 1.85) 1.05 (0.70, 1.58) 0.579
Model Cb 1 0.90 (0.56, 1.44) 0.89 (0.55, 1.45) 0.866 1 1.28 (0.79, 2.07) 1.27 (0.79, 2.02) 0.528
Model Db 1 0.83 (0.44, 1.55) 0.69 (0.37, 1.30) 0.513 1 1.82 (0.98, 3.39) 0.95 (0.47, 1.92) 0.062
Male
Unadjusted model 1 0.94 (0.66, 1.35) 0.90 (0.62, 1.30) 0.846 1 0.73 (0.54, 0.98) 0.67 (0.49, 0.90) 0.017
Model Ab 1 0.94 (0.65, 1.34) 0.91 (0.63, 1.32) 0.877 1 0.71 (0.53, 0.97) 0.63 (0.47, 0.86) 0.009
Model Bb 1 0.99 (0.68, 1.43) 1.04 (0.71, 1.53) 0.961 1 0.68 (0.50, 0.92) 0.63 (0.46, 0.87) 0.009
Model Cb 1 1.13 (0.71, 1.80) 1.14 (0.72, 1.81) 0.824 1 0.71 (0.49, 1.01) 0.70 (0.49, 1.02) 0.097
Model Db 1 1.13 (0.62, 2.05) 1.33 (0.76, 2.34) 0.601 1 0.98 (0.62, 1.55) 0.91 (0.57, 1.45) 0.906

aValues are models adjusted HR and 95% confidence interval, ranges for tertiles (T) 1 through 3. Linear trends (p for trend) were obtained with fat mass as continuous variables.

bModel A: adjusted for age, education, smoking, alcohol drinking, family history of cancer, version of Body Composition Analyzer; Model B: as model A and additionally adjusted for Karnofsky performance scores, duration of hospital stays, NRS 2002 score, nutrition support, and handgrip strength; Model C: as Model B and additionally adjusted for commodities, previous treatments, cancer types, TNM stages, and quality of life; Model D: as Model C and additionally adjusted C-reaction protein.