Table 3.
Performance comparison between a stand-alone classifier (CNN) and the proposed method.
Optimizer | Methods | Accuracy (%) | PPV (%) | Recall (%) | Specificity (%) | F1-score (%) | AUC | Loss | Total training time (s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adagrad | CNN | 92.45 | 93.91 | 87.02 | 94.91 | 90.89 | 0.91 | 0.52 | 464.75 |
Proposed method |
98.78 | 100 | 98.16 | 99.42 | 99.00 | 0.99 | – | 464.75 | |
RMSProp | CNN | 93.48 | 94.56 | 89.99 | 95.13 | 91.03 | 0.93 | 0.48 | 471.22 |
Proposed method |
98.99 | 100 | 98.65 | 99.49 | 99.50 | 0.99 | – | 471.22 | |
Adam | CNN | 93.92 | 95.01 | 90.09 | 95.89 | 92.22 | 0.95 | 0.41 | 476.85 |
Proposed method |
99.18 | 100 | 98.88 | 99.66 | 99.70 | 0.99 | – | 476.85 |