TABLE 2.
HGLM predicting STEM retention, TGNC subsample (n = 117)
Variable | B | SE | t | p | Significance | Delta-pa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | −3.260 | 2.458 | −1.33 | 0.815 | ||
URM status | −0.609 | 0.721 | −0.84 | 0.399 | ||
High school GPA | −0.054 | 0.216 | −0.25 | 0.803 | ||
First-generation status | 2.647 | 0.997 | 2.65 | 0.008 | ** | 43.4%i |
Faculty provide opportunity to work on research project | 0.415 | 0.303 | 1.37 | 0.17 | ||
Studied with other students | 0.182 | 0.439 | 0.42 | 0.678 | ||
Looked up scientific articles | 0.570 | 0.564 | 1.01 | 0.312 | ||
Felt my contributions were valued in class | 0.542 | 0.400 | 1.35 | 0.176 | ||
Self-rating: academic ability | 0.166 | 0.372 | 0.45 | 0.655 | ||
Sought personal counseling | −0.847 | 0.379 | −2.23 | 0.025 | * | −20.8%ii |
Felt depressed | −0.054 | 0.415 | −0.13 | 0.896 | ||
Sense of belonging on campus | 0.099 | 0.336 | 0.29 | 0.769 | ||
Demonstrated for a cause | 0.436 | 0.446 | 0.98 | 0.328 |
a47 clusters: (i) achieved power 38%; (ii) achieved power 86%.
*p < 0.05.
**p < 0.01.