Table 4.
Comparison of the proposed system with other (including current state-of-the-art) methods with MCYT-75 dataset.
| Author | Verification type | No. of training sample | FRR | FAR | AER |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [4] | WD | 5G | 32.4 | 26.84 | — |
| 10G | 22.93 | 22.04 | — | ||
| [65] | — | 6.67 | 12.44 | 9.56 | |
| [66] | WD | 5G | 23.25 | 4.53 | — |
| 10G | 12.61 | 7.53 | — | ||
| [42] | WD | 5G | 4.48 | 25.19 | 5.62 |
| 10G | 4.96 | 17.21 | 3.45 | ||
| [67] | WD | 10G | 12.53 | 13.16 | — |
| 5G | 15.47 | 13.42 | — | ||
| [44] | WD | 5G | 6.67 | 6.67 | 6.67 |
| 10G | 6.25 | 5.67 | 5.96 | ||
| 12G | 3.67 | 6.67 | 5.0 | ||
| Ours | WI | 5G | 4.12 | 4.48 | 4.30 |
| 10G | 3.68 | 3.96 | 3.82 | ||
| 12G | 3.49 | 3.53 | 3.51 |