Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 25;2022:4406101. doi: 10.1155/2022/4406101

Table 5.

Comparison of the proposed system with other (including current state-of-the-art) methods with CEDAR dataset.

Author Verification type No. of training sample FRR FAR AER
[68] WI 24G 8.33
[69] WD 16G 6.36 5.68 6.02
[33] WD 12G 9.36 7.84 8.60
[42] WD 5G 4.44 15.91 3.64
10G 5.83 11.52 2.74
[70] WI 4G 8.70
8G 7.41 8.25 7.83
12G 5.60
[44] WD 5G 12.5 8.33 10.41
10G 8.33 4.17 6.25
12G 4.67 4.67 4.67
Ours WI 5G 4.32 7.84 6.08
10G 5.72 4.12 5.92
12G 3.97 4.33 4.15