Table 1.
Summary of deep learning based low-dose to full-dose post-processing implementations reviewed in this work. Details from each
source are: the neural network architecture, dimensions of the input data, additional input information, tracer, anatomical region, activity and acquisition time, the dose or time reduction factor, and the evaluation metrics used to convey performance
Network architecture | PET input dimensions | Additional input data | Tracers | Anatomy | Activity/Acq, time (MBq, min) | Dose/time reduction factor | Evaluation metrics | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[73] | CNN | 2D Patch | T1 | 18F-FDG | Brain | (203,12) | 4 | PSNR, nMSE |
[74] | Unet | 2.5D | None | 18F-FDG | Brain | (370,40) | 200 | SSIM, PSNR, NRMSE |
[75] | Residual Unet | 2D | T1, T2, FLAIR | 18F-FBB | Brain | (330, 20) | 100 | PSNR, RMSE, SSIM, QCS, rSUV, CD |
[76] | Unet | 3D | CT | 18F-FDG | Cardiac | (300,10) | 10, 100 | LVEF, ESV, EDV |
[77] | Modified Unet | 2.5D | LAVA | 18F-FDG | Whole body |
Site 1: (3 kg−1, 3.5 bed−1) Site 2: (3 kg−1, 4 bed−1) |
16 | PSNR, NRMSE, SSIM, rSUV, CTD |
[78] | Unet | 3D Patch | None | 18F-FDG | Brain | (5.18 kg−1, 5 bed−1) | 7.5, 30 | SNR, SSIM |
[79] | CNN (Dilating convolutional kernels) | 2D | None | 18F-FDG | Brain | (166.5, 10) | 10 | MAE, PSNR, SSIM, rMAE |
[80] | Unet | 3D | None | 18F-FDG | Brain | (205, 20) | 20 | PSNR, RMSE, SSIM, rSUV, QCS |
[81] | FFNN | 2D Patch | None | Sim 82Rb, 82Rb | Cardiac | (N/A, 7) | 7, 3.5, 1.5 | NMSE, ROI Contrast |
[82] | Unet | 3D Patch | None | 18F-FDG | Whole body | (225.3, 10) | 6.7, 9.1, 13.3, 17.5, 26.3, 66.7, 125, 250, 500 | Lesion SUV, QCS, CTD |
[83] | Modified Unet | 2D | Sim T1 | Sim 18F-FDG | Brain | (N/A, N/A) | N/A | MSE, Lesion CR |
[84] | CNN | 3D | T1 | 18F-FDG | Brain | (N/A, N/A) | 10, 100 | NRMSE, SUV bias |
[85] | cycleGAN | 2D Patch | None | 18F-FDG | Brain | (218.3, 20) | 125 | PSNR, NRMSE, SSIM, SUV bias |
[86] | GAN | 2D | None | 18F-FBB | Brain | (300, 20) | 10 | PSNR, NRMSE, SSIM, rSUV, QCS, CD |
[87] | GAN | 3D Patch | None | 18F-FDG | Whole body | (5.55 kg−1, 20) | 2 | SSIM, PSNR |
[88] | cycleGAN | 3D Patch | None | 18F-FDG | Whole body |
BMI 18.5: (370, 1.5 bed−1) BMI 25: (370, 2 bed−1) BMI 30: (370, 2.5 bed−1) 30 BMI: (444, 2.5 bed−1) |
8 | MAE, NRMSE, rPSNR |
[89] | cycleGAN | 2D Patch | None | 18F-FDG | Whole Body | (370, 5) | 3.3, 10 | PSNR, NRMSE SUV bias |
[90] | GAN | 2D Patch | None | 18F-FDG | Whole body | (N/A, N/A) | 10 | PSNR, RMSE, SSIM Lesion SUV |
[91] | GAN | 2.5D | None | 18F-FBB | Brain | (330, 20) | 100 | PSNR, RMSE, SSIM, FBM, EBM, CD |
[92] | GAN | 3D Patch | None | 18F-FDG | Brain | (203, 12) | 4 | PSNR, nMSE, rSUV |
[93] | GAN | 3D Patch | T1, DT | 18F-FDG | Brain | (203, 12) | 4 | PSNR, SSIM, rCR |
[94] | GAN | 3D Patch | None | 18F-FDG | Whole body | (5.55 kg−1, 20) | 5 | NRMSE, PSNR, RFSIM, VIF |
[95] | CAE, Unet, GAN | 2D, 2.5D, 3D | None | 18F-FDG | Thoracic | (370, 20) | 10 | PSNR, nMSE, Lesion SUV bias |
[96] | Residual Unet | 2D | T1, T2, FLAIR | 18F-FBB | Brain |
LD: (8, 30) FD: (334, 20) |
42 | PSNR, RMSE, SSIM rSUV, QCS, CD |
[97] | Residual Unet | 2D | T1, T2, FLAIR | 18F-FBB | Brain |
Site 1: (330, 20) Site 2: (283, 20) |
Site 1: 100 Site 2: 20 |
PSNR, RMSE, SSIM rSUV, QCS, CD |
[98] | Unet | 3D Patch | None | 18F-FDG, 18F-FMISO, 68Ga-Dotatate | Whole body |
FDG: (340, 20) FMISO: (181, 50) DOTATATE: (130, 21.6) |
10 | PSNR, NRMSE, Lesion SUV bias |
[99] | Residual Unet | 2.5D | None | Sim 18F-FDG, 18F-FDG | Brain | (185, 70) | 4 | CR |
[100] | Unet | 2.5D | None | 18F-FDG | Whole body |
Site 1: (481, 3 bed−1) Site 2: (400, 3 bed−1) Site 3: (429, 3 bed−1) |
4 | QCS, CTD, rSUV |
[101] | Residual Unet | 3D | None | 18F-FDG | Whole body | (391, 2.45 bed−1) | 1.33, 2, 4 | CTD, rSUV |
[102] | Modified Unet | 2.5D | T1, T2 | 18F-FDG | Brain | (230, 30) | 180 | PSNR, SSIM |
DT diffusion tensor, PSNR peak signal-to-noise ratio, RMSE root mean square error, NRMSE normalised root mean square error, MSE mean square error, MAE mean absolute error, rSUV regional SUV, CR contrast recovery, SSIM structural similarity index, QCS qualitative clinical score, CD clinical diagnosis, CTD clinical tumour detectability, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, EDV end diastolic volume, ESV end systolic volume, LAVA liver acquisition volume acceleration, RFSIM Riesz-transform based feature similarity, VIF visual information fidelity, Sim simulated data