Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Value Health. 2022 Jan 3;25(7):1081–1086. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1368

Table 1.

Baseline and other characteristics by completion status of the EOT survey

Completed EOT survey (N=65) Did not complete EOT survey (N=54) P-value1
Treatment arm as randomizedn (%) 0.46
 Cabozantinib 31 (47.7%) 30 (55.6%)
 Mitoxantrone 34 (52.3%) 24 (44.4%)
Age in yearsmedian (range) 65 (53–79) 66.5 (44–80) 0.17
Racen (%) 0.75
 White 55 (84.6%) 45 (83.3%)
 Black 5 (7.7%) 6 (11.1%)
 Other 5 (7.7%) 3 (5.6%)
Countryn (%) 0.01
 Australia 11 (16.9%) 7 (13.0%)
 Canada 8 (12.3%) 2 (3.7%)
 United Kingdom 5 (7.7%) 16 (29.6%)
 United States 41 (63.1%) 29 (53.7%)
ECOG Performance Statusn (%) 0.16
 0–1 60 (92.3%) 45 (83.3%)
 ≥2 5 (7.7%) 9 (16.7%)
Prior Cabazitaxeln (%) 21 (32.3%) 28 (51.9%) 0.04
End of treatment reasonn (%) 0.02
 Disease progression 42 (64.6%) 22 (40.7%)
 Adverse event 12 (18.5%) 13 (24.1%)
 Other/unknown 11 (16.9%) 19 (35.2%)

EOT, end of treatment; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

1

P-values are based on Wilcoxon rank-sum test for age and Fisher’s exact test for all other characteristics.