Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 16;33(4):e35. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e35

Table 3. Associations between MetS and the risk of endometrial cancer according to obesity status.

Metabolic phenotype BMI
Normal (<23 kg/m2) Overweight (23–25 kg/m2) Obese (≥25 kg/m2)
HR (95% CI)* p-value HR (95% CI)* p-value HR (95% CI)* p-value
MetS
No 1 1 1
Yes 1.02 (0.87–1.19) 0.790 1.00 (0.89–1.13) 0.998 1.29 (1.20–1.39) <0.001
Component of MetS
Elevated BP
No 1 1 1
Yes 0.98 (0.88–1.08) 0.653 0.93 (0.84–1.03) 0.177 1.26 (1.17–1.36) <0.001
Elevated FBG
No 1 1 1
Yes 0.97 (0.87–1.07) 0.542 1.10 (0.99–1.23) 0.069 1.17 (1.09–1.26) <0.001
High WC
No 1 1 1
Yes 1.15 (0.99–1.32) 0.058 0.92 (0.83–1.02) 0.113 1.26 (1.14–1.39) <0.001
Elevated TG
No 1 1 1
Yes 1.00 (0.89–1.13) 0.980 1.00 (0.90–1.13) 0.942 1.19 (1.10–1.28) <0.001
Reduced HDL
No 1 1 1
Yes 1.03 (0.93–1.13) 0.599 1.12 (1.01–1.24) 0.028 1.13 (1.05–1.22) 0.001

BP, blood pressure; CI, confidence interval; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HR, hazard ratio; MetS, metabolic syndrome; TG, triglyceride; WC, waist circumference.

*Adjusted for age, smoking, drinking, vigorous physical activity, moderate physical activity, walking, age at menarche, age at menopause, number of children, breast feeding, oral contraceptive use, and family history of cancer.