Table 2.
A. Characteristics of the included studies B. Outcomes of the individual studies
Reference | Study design | Country | Sample size | Age, yMean ± SD or Median (IQR) | Disease severity | Intervention |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hendawy et al.[27] | case series | Egypt | 2 | 50 (min-max: 40-60) | Hospitalized, severe illness | Ozonized rectal insufflation +standard therapy |
Franzini et al.[28] | case series | Italy | 50 | 75 ± 11.4 | Hospitalized, severe illness | Major autohemotherapy + standard therapy |
Hernandez et al.[29] | case series | Spain | 3 | 61 (min-max: 49-64) | Hospitalized, severe illness | Major autohemotherapy + standard therapy |
Wu et al.[30] | case series | China | 4 | 60 (54.5-70.5) | Hospitalized, mild to severe illness | Major autohemotherapy + standard therapy |
Reference | Clinical improvement | All-cause mortalityN (%) | Length of Hospital Stay(Mean ± SD) | Laboratory outcome(Mean ± SD / Median) | Any adverse eventsN (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Outcome | Baseline | Outcome | ||||
Hendawy et al.[27] |
|
|
0 (0%) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0 (0%) |
|
|
||||||
Franzini et al.[28] |
|
|
2 (4%) | 22.13 ± 3.44 |
|
|
NR |
| |||||||
Hernandez et al.[29] |
|
|
0 (0%) | 3.67 ± 0.58 |
|
|
0 (0%) |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
Wu et al.[30] | P/F ratio: 80 | P/F ratio: 362 | 0 (0%) | 22 ± 7.87 | NA | NA | 0% |
P/F ratio: 423 | P/F ratio: 405 | NA | NA | ||||
P/F ratio: 410 | P/F ratio: 306 | NA | NA | ||||
P/F ratio: 575 | P/F ratio: 412 | NA | NA |
N/A: not available; SD, standard deviation; RR, respiratory rate; HR, Heart rate; CRP, c-reactive protein; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; WBC, white blood cells; IL, Interleukin; PCT, pro-calcitonin; ALT, alanine transaminase; LFT, liver function test; * p<0.05; ** p<0.001
SD, standard deviation; IQR: inter-quartile range