Table 4.
ASD clinician review interrater reliability by site, sex and race/ethnicity, cognitive level, and ASD classification, ADDM network surveillance year 2014
ADDM 2014 (n = 924 pairs; 34 reviewers) |
||
---|---|---|
% Agree | Kappa | |
ADDM network site* | ||
Arkansas | .97 | .93 |
Arizona | .89 | .78 |
Colorado | .91 | .81 |
Georgia | .91 | .82 |
Maryland | .89 | .77 |
Minnesota | .87 | .75 |
Missouri | .92 | .82 |
North Carolina | .96 | .92 |
New Jersey | .92 | .84 |
Tennessee | .89 | .75 |
Wisconsin | .93 | .86 |
Sex | ||
Male (N = 710) | .92 | .83 |
Female (N = 214) | .95 | .90 |
Race/ethnicity* | ||
White, Non-Hispanic (N = 433) | .93 | .85 |
Black, Non-Hispanic (N = 249) | .92 | .85 |
Asian or Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic (N = 39) | .90 | .80 |
Other Race or Multiracial, Non-Hispanic (N = 28) | .93 | .86 |
Race Missing/Not Stated, Non-Hispanic (N = 16) | .91 | 1.0 |
Hispanic (N = 155) | 1.00 | .82 |
Cognitive level from most recent test in records | ||
Intellectually disabled (IQ < = 70) (N = 211) | .92 | .81 |
Borderline (IQ 71–85) (N = 160) | .92 | .83 |
Average or above average (IQ > = 85) (N = 315) | .91 | .83 |
No cognitive test data (N = 238) | .95 | .89 |
ASD classification from source records | ||
ASD diagnosis or eligibility on record (N = 430) | .97 | .77 |
ASD suspected, but no documented diagnosis or eligibility on record (N = 199) | .85 | .70 |
No mention of ASD on record (N = 295) | .90 | .68 |