Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 20;10:832881. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.832881

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

First
author, year
Country/
Region
Study design Total sample/
Analysis sample
Sex (male/
female)
Age (range/
mean)
Follow-up
time (years)
Noise
type
Noise
assessment
Noise
value (dB)
Types of
dementia
Outcome
assessment
Quality assessment
(NOS/AHRQ)*
Andersson et al. (21) Umeå, Sweden cohort study 1721/1721 985/736 55–85/68.5 ± 9.4 7 traffic noise Umeå Municipality Noise Survey/Leq.24 h <55; ≥ 55 dementia NINCDS–ADRDAa 7
Tyas et al. (50) Manitoba, Canada cohort study 1355/694 261/433 65–93/74.0 ± 5.8 5 community noise scale NA AD NINCDS–ADRDA 7
Weuve et al. (52) Chicago, USA cohort study 7909/5227 1986/3241 NA/73.7 ± 6.9 4.1 community noise universal kriging model developed for the Chicago area/Leq 10:00–16:00 range 51.1–78.2 AD; MCI NINCDS–ADRDA 8
Yuchi et al. (41) Metro Vancouver, Canada case–control study 13498/13498 NA 45–84/NA 5 community noise Lden case range 33.0–86.5; control range 4.4–92.4 AD hospital records 7
cohort study 633949/
633949
300197/
333752
45–83/NA Lden case range 44.5–77.2; control range 32.2–85.8 NAD hospital records 9
Fuks et al. (49) North Rhine–Westphalia, Germany cohort study 834/288 0/288 67–80/74.5± 2.2 25 community noise Lden mean 55.9 ± 7.7 MCI CERAD Neuropsychological Assessment Batteryb 7
Lnight mean 47.2 ± 7.4 MCI CERAD Neuropsychological Assessment Battery
traffic noise ICBEN Daytime NA MCI CERAD Neuropsychological Assessment Battery
ICBEN Night NA MCI CERAD Neuropsychological Assessment Battery
Yu et al. (53) California Sacramento Valley, USA cohort study 1789/1612 680/932 >60/70.2 ±6.8 6.5 traffic noise Leq; 24-h Noise/Nighttime Noise mean Lden=68.5 ± 8.9 Lnight=60.4 ± 8.9 MCI 3 MSE/SEVLTc 7
Yu et al. (53) California Sacramento Valley, USA cohort study 1789/1612 680/932 >60/70.2 ±6.8 6.5 traffic noise Leq; 24-h Noise mean Lden=68.5 ± 8.9 MCI 3 MSE/SEVLT 7
Tzivian et al. (51) Ruhr,
Germany
cross–sectional study 4157/2050 1007/1043 NA/64.1 ± 7.7 NA traffic noise Lden; Lnight mean Lden=53.74 ± 9.49 Lnight=44.88 ± 9.17 MCI International Working Group on MCI criteria 10
Carey et al. (47) London, England cohort study 139718/
130978
65130/
65848
50–79/NA 6.9 traffic noise TRAffic Noise EXposure (TRANEX) model/ Lnight mean 52.1 ± 4.6 AD; VaD NA 8
Crous-Bou et al. (48) Barcelona,
Spain
cross–
sectional study
228/288 136/92 NA/57.7 ±7.6 NA traffic noise Lden; Lnight mean 67.7 ± 5.77 AD MRId 6
Cantuaria et al. (46) Danmark cohort study 1938994/
1938994
907991/
1031003
≥60/NA 8.5 road traffic noise Lden max mean 55.3 AD; VaD clinical diagnosis 8
railway traffic noise Lden max mean 44.3 AD; VaD clinical diagnosis
road traffic noise Lden min mean 51.6 AD; VaD clinical diagnosis
railway traffic noise Lden min mean 44.7 AD; VaD clinical diagnosis

*, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort and case–control studies and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) recommended items for cross–sectional studies. a, National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS–ADRDA) criteria. b, Consortium to Establish a Registry on Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) Neuropsychological Assessment Battery. c, Modified Mini–Mental State Examination (3 MSE) and Spanish English Verbal Learning Test (SEVLT). d, Magnetic Resonance Imaging.