Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 4.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Protoc. 2022 Jan 12;17(2):421–444. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00648-5

Table 1 |.

CryoET data collection and processing details

Titan Krios GagT8I Gag WT (EMPIAR-10164) Ribosome (EMPIAR-10304) Apoferritin

Voltage (kV) 300 300 300 300
Detector Falcon 4 Gatan K2 Gatan K3 Gatan K3
Energy filter Selectris X, 10 eV slit Gatan bioquantum, 20 eV Gatan bioquantum, 20 eV Gatan bioquantum, 20 eV
Super-resolution mode Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pixel size (Å) 1.18 1.35 2.1 1.34
Total electron dose (e-2) 122 ~120 ~120 102
Dose rate (e-/Å2/s ) 3 3 4.2
Frame number 10 10 10
Acquisition scheme −60/60°, 3° −60/60°, 3° −60/60°, 3° −60/60°, 3°
Defocus range (μm) −1.36 ~ −3.11 −1.5 ~ −3.96 −2.2 ~ −4.3 −1.5 ~ −3.5
Number of tilt-series 5 5 12 6
Software IMOD, emClarity IMOD, emClarity IMOD, emClarity IMOD, emClarity
Number of tomograms 5 5 12 6
Number of initial subtomograms 20010 15791 10441 5668
Number of subtomograms after classification 13844 15460 8131 4826
Symmetry imposed C6 C6 C1 O
Resolution at 0.143 FSC 5.0 Å/4.5 Å* 3.3 7.0 2.8
Data deposited EMPIAR-10643 EMD-13390 EMD-13354 EMD-13270 EMPIAR-10787 EMD-13271
*

Density maps were calculated using subtomograms averaged in emClarity (5.0 Å) or using projection images (4.5 Å) reconstructed by cisTEM implemented in emClarity.