Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 15;12(6):2659–2672.

Table 6.

Predict factors associated with HCC extrahepatic recurrence

Variable Comparison Univariate Multivariate 1a Multivariate 2b



HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Age (years) > 60 vs. ≤ 60 0.36 (0.12-1.14) 0.083 0.55 (0.14-2.16) 0.387
Sex Male vs. Female 0.54 (0.19-1.59) 0.265
Diabetes mellitus Yes vs. No 1.21 (0.38-3.80) 0.747
CHB Yes vs. No 2.01 (0.64-6.32) 0.232
CHC Yes vs. No 0.76 (0.24-2.39) 0.638
MAFLD Yes vs. No 0.43 (0.05-3.46) 0.429
AFP (ng/mL) > 10 vs. ≤ 10 14.89 (1.96-113.24) 0.009 6.69 (0.81-55.12) 0.077
Liver cirrhosis Yes vs. No 2.05 (0.73-5.78) 0.173
Child-Pugh grade B vs. A 0.96 (0.13-7.32) 0.969
Tumor number Multiple vs. Single 0.85 (0.11-6.49) 0.877
Tumor size (cm) > 2 vs. ≤ 2 1.53 (0.43-5.41) 0.514
Histological grade Poor vs. well + moderate 15.01 (4.20-53.68) < 0.001 16.279 (3.09-85.75) 0.001 18.29 (3.56-93.88) < 0.001
Capsule invasion Yes vs. No 2.03 (0.27-15.53) 0.495
Microvascular invasion None Reference
Capsule vein 1.92 (0.46-8.04) 0.371
Portal vein 3.01 (0.58-15.55) 0.188
Both 10.94 (3.16-37.96) < 0.001 8.54 (2.34-31.22) 0.001 8.74 (2.38-32.03) 0.001

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; MVI, microvascular invasion; CHB, chronic hepatitis B; CHC, chronic hepatitis C; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AFP, alpha fetoprotein; BCLC, Barcelona clinical liver cancer; MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

a

Multivariate 1: multivariable analysis based on all potential risk factors (P < 0.1 in the univariate Cox model) forced into the model.

b

Multivariate 2: multivariable analysis with variables (P < 0.1 in the univariate Cox model) using forward stepwise conditional LR method with P < 0.05 as selection criterion.