TABLE 2. Regression Analysis of the ICP Predictions With the Actual ICP Data for all 13 Patients.
Patient # | Pearson Correlation (R2) | p-value* (Pearson) | Spearman Rank Correlation ( ) | p-value** (Spearman) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.90 | p < 0.001 | 0.95 | p < 0.001 |
2 | 0.74 | p < 0.001 | 0.87 | p < 0.001 |
3 | 0.75 | p < 0.001 | 0.89 | p < 0.001 |
4 | 0.58 | p < 0.001 | 0.89 | p < 0.001 |
5 | 0.90 | p < 0.001 | 0.95 | p < 0.001 |
6 | 0.97 | p < 0.001 | 0.98 | p < 0.001 |
7 | 0.69 | p < 0.001 | 0.87 | p < 0.001 |
8 | 0.60 | p < 0.001 | 0.82 | p < 0.001 |
9 | 0.95 | p < 0.001 | 0.98 | p < 0.001 |
10 | 0.79 | p < 0.001 | 0.90 | p < 0.001 |
11 | 0.89 | p < 0.001 | 0.93 | p < 0.001 |
12 | 0.80 | p < 0.001 | 0.92 | p < 0.001 |
13 | 0.79 | p < 0.001 | 0.89 | p < 0.001 |
the null hypothesis was rejected at p < 0.05.
the null hypothesis was rejected at p < 0.05.