. 2022 Jun 25;2022:3771610. doi: 10.1155/2022/3771610

Table 2.

Results of clinical classification and severity score of three groups of AP patients.

Typing of AP	Group I (n = 520)	Group II (n = 69)	Group III (n = 198)	p value
Clinical classification
MAP	413 (79.4)	21 (30.4)	21 (10.6)	<0.01^Ф
MSAP	75 (14.4)	25 (36.2)	53 (26.8)	<0.01^Ф
SAP	32 (6.2)	23 (33.4)	124 (62.6)	<0.01^Ф
BISAP score ( $\bar{x} \pm s$ , d)	2.1 ± 0.8	2.4 ± 1.3	4.5 ± 1.2	<0.01^§
Ranson score ( $\bar{x} \pm s$ , d)	2.5 ± 0.3	2.8 ± 0.1	5.9 ± 0.4	<0.01^§
APACHE-II score ( $\bar{x} \pm s$ , d)	8.4 ± 1.6	15.2 ± 2.3	20.12 ± 3.1	<0.01^Ф
MCTSI score ( $\bar{x} \pm s$ , d)	3.5 ± 0.8	6.4 ± 1.1	9.2 ± 1.3	<0.01^Ф

Group I: acute biliary pancreatitis; group II: acute alcoholic pancreatitis; group III: hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis; MAP: mild acute pancreatitis; MSAP: moderately severe acute pancreatitis; SAP: severe acute pancreatitis; APACHE-II: acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; MCTSI: modified computed tomography severity index. ^Фp < 0.01: the difference between any two groups was statistically significant. ^§p < 0.01: the difference between group III and group I or group II was statistically significant.