Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 30;50(W1):W228–W234. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac278

Table 3.

Results of signal type prediction; cross-validation

DeepLoc 2.0 Specialized
ESM1b ProtT5 Predictor
MicroF1 0.87 ± 0.01 0.87 ± 0.02
MacroF1 0.80 ± 0.02 0.80 ± 0.03
Accuracy 0.78 ± 0.02 0.79 ± 0.03
MCC per signal (↑ is better)
SP 0.89 ± 0.03 0.90 ± 0.03 0.87 ± 0.02 (32)
TM 0.71 ± 0.07 0.66 ± 0.05 -
MT 0.93 ± 0.02 0.93 ± 0.03 0.94 ± 0.04 (33)
CH 0.85 ± 0.07 0.86 ± 0.09 0.96 ± 0.03 (33)
TH 0.86 ± 0.08 0.80 ± 0.08 0.98 ± 0.04 (33)
NLS 0.65 ± 0.06 0.66 ± 0.01 -
NES 0.49 ± 0.20 0.46 ± 0.17 -
PTS 0.85 ± 0.06 0.90 ± 0.05 -
GPI 0.85 ± 0.06 0.86 ± 0.06 0.91 ± 0.01 (34)

SP = Signal Peoptide, TM = First transmembrane domain, MT = Mitochondrial transit peptide , CH = Chloroplast transit peptide, TH = Thylakoidal transit peptide, NLS = Nuclear localization signal, NES = Nuclear export signal, PTS = Peroxisomal targeting signal, GPI = GPI-anchor