Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 31;26(8):2516–2530. doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03590-z

Table 4.

Unadjusted and adjusted analyses to identify knowledge, behavioral, and experiential correlates of PrEP consultations among PrEP-eligible AGYW

Adolescent girls Young women
No (n = 105) n(%) Yes (n = 34) n (%) z test statistica p valuea aPR (95% CI) No (n = 160) n (%) Yes (n = 112) n (%) Chi-square test statistic p value aPR (95% CI)
Characteristics
Socioeconomic position
 Low 19 (82.61) 4 (17.39) 21 (50.00) 21 (50.00)
 Middle/High 86 (74.14) 30 (25.86) − 0.84 0.399 139 (60.43) 91 (39.57) 1.60 0.206
Orphanhood
 Never 65 (80.25) 16 (19.75) 63 (55.26) 51 (44.74)
 Ever 40 (68.97) 18 (31.03) 1.52 0.128 97 (61.39) 61 (38.61) 1.03 0.311
Married
 Never 90 (77.59) 26 (22.41) 77 (62.10) 47 (37.90)
 Ever 15 (65.22) 8 (34.78) 1.35 0.177 83 (56.08) 65 (43.92) 1.01 0.315
Pregnant
 Never 66 (77.65) 19 (22.35) 36 (69.23) 16 (30.77)
 Ever 39 (72.22) 15 (27.78) 0.76 0.449 124 (56.36) 96 (43.64) 2.88 0.090
School enrollment
 Not enrolled 46 (69.70) 20 (30.30) 130 (61.03) 83 (38.97)
 Currently enrolled 59 (80.82) 14 (19.18) − 1.53 0.126 30 (50.85) 29 (49.15) 1.98 0.160
Perceived HIV risk
 Low 78 (74.29) 27 (25.71) 122 (61.31) 77 (38.69)
 High 27 (79.41) 7 (20.59) − 0.59 0.555 38 (52.05) 35 (47.95) 1.89 0.170
Travel outside the community
 Once a year or less 87 (79.82) 22 (20.18) 123 (62.44) 74 (37.56)
 Once a month or more 18 (60.00) 12 (40.00) 2.36 0.018 37 (49.33) 38 (50.67) 3.85 0.050
Location
 Peri-urban 53 (75.71) 17 (24.29) 81 (63.28) 47 (36.72)
 Urban 52 (75.36) 17 (24.64) 0.05 0.960 79 (54.86) 65 (45.14) 1.98 0.159
Travel time to clinic/hospital
  < 15 min 19 (76.00) 6 (24.00) 31 (64.58) 17 (35.42)
 15–29 min 33 (75.00) 11 (25.00) 0.09 0.928 44 (53.66) 38 (46.34)
 30–44 min 26 (74.29) 9 (25.71) 0.15 0.881 51 (64.56) 28 (35.44)
 45–59 min 11 (78.57) 3 (21.43) − 0.18 0.853 14 (63.64) 8 (36.36)
  ≥ 60 min 16 (76.19) 5 (23.81) − 0.02 0.982 20 (48.78) 21 (51.22) 4.55 0.337
Ministry of health PrEP eligibility criteria
Trying to conceive in a serodiscordant relationship
 No 105 (75.54) 34 (24.46) 157 (59.02) 109 (40.98)
 Yes 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) b b 3 (50.00) 3 (50.00) c 0.693d
Recurrent sex with alcohol/drugs
 No 103 (76.30) 32 (23.70) 143 (58.85) 100 (41.15)
 Yes 2 (50.00) 2 (50.00) 1.42 0.156 17 (58.62) 12 (41.38)  < 0.01 0.981
Engaged in transactional sex
 No 93 (74.40) 32 (25.60) 148 (60.91) 95 (39.09)
 Yes 12 (85.71) 2 (14.29) − 0.86 0.390 12 (41.38) 17 (58.62) 4.08 0.043
Recurrent PEP use
 No 104 (84.55) 19 (15.45) Ref 159 (67.37) 77 (32.63) Ref
 Yes 1 (6.25) 15 (93.75) 8.15  < 0.001 5.63 (3.53–8.97) 1 (2.78) 35 (97.22) 53.81  < 0.001 2.81 (2.30–3.43)
Do not know partner(s) HIV status
 No 93 (77.50) 27 (22.50) 146 (60.58) 95 (39.42)
 Yes 12 (63.16) 7 (36.84) 1.42 0.155 14 (45.16) 17 (54.84) 2.70 0.101
Sex with more than 1 person
 No 91 (77.12) 27 (22.88) 144 (62.88) 85 (37.12) Ref
 Yes 14 (66.67) 7 (33.33) 1.07 0.286 16 (37.21) 27 (62.79) 9.85 0.002 1.39 (1.06–1.82)
Recent STI
 No 81 (76.42) 25 (23.58) 127 (61.06) 81 (38.94)
 Yes 24 (72.73) 9 (27.27) 0.43 0.667 33 (51.56) 31 (48.44) 1.82 0.177
Ongoing IPV/GBV
 No 62 (78.48) 17 (21.52) 100 (60.24) 66 (39.76)
 Yes 43 (71.67) 17 (28.33) 0.92 0.356 60 (56.60) 46 (43.40) 0.35 0.552
Inconsistent/no condom use
 No 18 (72.00) 7 (28.00) 8 (57.14) 6 (42.86)
 Yes 87 (76.32) 27 (23.68) − 0.46 0.643 152 (58.91) 106 (41.09) 0.02 0.896

Row percentages are presented

A dash (–) represents eligibility criteria that were included in the initial adjusted model but were removed during the backward selection process

For AG, the adjusted model (aPR column) included travel outside the community and program targeting

PrEP pre-exposure prophylaxis, AGYW adolescent girls and young women, aPR adjusted prevalence ratio, CI confidence intervals, PEP post-exposure prophylaxis, ref reference category, STI sexually transmitted infection, IPV intimate partner violence, GBV gender-based violence

aTest statistic and p values were generated using a model that controlled for differential program targeting

bTest statistic and p value cannot be calculated due to zero respondents in one category

cData omitted because the Fisher’s Exact Test does not have a corresponding test statistic

dp value based on Fisher's Exact Test