Table 2.
Acceptability and Feasibility of peer navigation intervention among Trans Amigas intervention arm participants, n = 75
| Acceptability—navigation participants | Overall (n = 75) |
Endline Survey (n = 54)£ |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | |
| Proportion of TGW beginning navigation | ||||
| Yes—at least one telephone call/text | 68 | 90.7 | – | – |
| Yes—at least one in-person meeting | 52 | 69.3 | – | – |
| Never made contact | 7 | 9.3 | – | – |
| Would continue services if they could | – | – | 46 | 85.2 |
| Would recommend navigation to a friend | – | – | 51 | 94.4 |
| Helpfulness of navigation | ||||
| Very helpful | – | – | 27 | 50.0 |
| Somewhat helpful | – | – | 18 | 33.3 |
| Not at all helpful | – | – | 9¥ | 16.7 |
| Adequacy of face-to-face contact | ||||
| Not enough | – | – | 29 | 53.7 |
| Just about right | – | – | 25 | 46.3 |
| Too much | – | – | 0 | 0.0 |
| Adequacy of phone/text contact | ||||
| Not enough | – | – | 13 | 24.1 |
| Just about right | – | – | 39 | 72.2 |
| Too much | – | – | 2 | 3.7 |
| Feasibility—navigation participants | ||||
| In-person sessions completed | ||||
| Non adherent (no completed sessions) | 23 | 30.7 | – | – |
| Poor adherence (1–3 sessions) | 17 | 22.6 | – | – |
| Moderate adherence (4–7 sessions) | 12 | 16.0 | – | – |
| Fully adherent (8–9 sessions)* | 23 | 30.7 | – | – |
| Phone/text monthly communication | ||||
| Non adherent (no successful contact) | 7 | 9.3 | – | – |
| Poor adherence (1–3 months) | 15 | 20.0 | – | – |
| Moderate adherence (4–7 months) | 26 | 34.7 | – | – |
| Fully adherent (8–9 months) | 27 | 36.0 | – | – |
| Moderate or full adherence to both components | 35 | 46.7 | – | – |
| Total navigation minutes (median, IQR) | 220.0 | 48.0–657.0 | – | – |
*Navigation completed; participant graduated
¥7 of 9 respondents never attended an in-person meeting
£One endline respondent never made contact with their navigator