Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 21;13:854313. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.854313

Table 3.

Connectivity analysis results for each group.

L-D L-I Controls p
Pathological side
Anterior hippocampus DMN 1.2 (2.6) 0.009 (2.2) 1 (2.1) n.s.
DAN 1.56 (2.5) −0.86 (2.3) −0.37 (1.8) <0.05
EXE 2.6 (3.5) −0.61 (2.6) 1.66 (3.4) n.s.
Posterior hippocampus DMN −1.27 (2.1) 0.44 (1.9) 0.96 (1) <0.05
DAN 0.57 (2.6) 0.41 (2.3) 0.12 (2.5) n.s.
EXE 0.13 (3.2) −0.64 (2.1) −1.1 (2.3) n.s.
Whole hippocampus DMN −0.38 (2.08) −0.86 (1.96) 3.64 (2.1) <0.05
DAN 0.98 (0.98) 0.13 (1.8) −1.15 (2) <0.05
EXE 0.1 (2.02) −0.094 (1.96) −0.13 (2.4) n.s.
Healthy side
Anterior hippocampus DMN −0.15 (2.8) 0.29 (2.1) 1.31 (1.8) <0.05
DAN 2.1 (2.7) −0.11 (2.2) 1.18 (2.3) n.s.
EXE 1.92 (1.8) 0.87 (3.4) 1.4 (3.7) <0.05
Posterior hippocampus DMN −0.04 (2.3) 1.61 (1.7) 1 (1.4) <0.05
DAN 0.74 (2.6) 0.44 (2) 0.81 (2) n.s.
EXE −0.002 (2.7) −1.05 (2.4) −0.1 (1.9) n.s.
Whole hippocampus DMN −0.81 (1.09) 0.57 (1.42) 4.84 (2.05) <0.05
DAN 0.82 (2.54) 0.46 (2.18) −0.82 (2.05) n.s.
EXE 0.71 (2.1) −0.56 (2.34) 0.12 (1.89) n.s.

Data represents the z-scores across all values of the hippocampal subregions averaged in the different networks, presented as mean (standard deviation).

L-D, learning decline; L-I, learning intact; DMN, Default Mode Network; DAN, Dorsal Attention Network; EXE, Executive Network. Significance was assessed with a MANOVA test as described previously. The bold values indicate the statistically significant.