Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 21;4:900172. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.900172

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) scores of both groups.

Characteristic Mobile application arm (n = 17) Routine follow-up arm (n = 16) p-value
Sex, No. (%)
Male 9 (53) 12 (75)
Female 8 (47) 4 (25)
Median age (SD), years-old 61.6 (10.5) 63.8 (12.7)
Performance status, No. (%) 0.99
0 1 (5.9) 1 (6.25)
1 9 (52.9) 8 (50)
2 4 (23.5) 4 (25)
3 2 (11.8) 2 (12.5)
4 1 (5.9) 1 (6.25)
Histology subtype, No. (%) 0.29
Adenocarcinoma 17 (100) 15 (93.75)
Small cell lung cancer 0 1 (6.25)
Technical skill, No. (%) 0.86
Able 9 (53) 8 (50)
Family aids 8 (47) 8 (50)
Active treatment, No. (%) 0.32
Chemotherapy 9 (52.9) 12 (75)
Targeted therapy 7 (41.2) 4 (25)
Immunotherapy 1 (5.9) 0
Line of treatment, No. (%) 0.92
1st line 13 (76.5) 12 (75)
2nd line 4 (23.5) 4 (25)
Symptom scores by application at baseline, mean (lower 95% mean, upper 95% mean, SE) 6.88 (4.78, 8.97, SE = 0.98) 7.25 (4.78, 9.38, SE = 1.01) 0.79
FACT-L at baseline, mean (lower 95% mean, upper 95% mean, SE) 90 (79.1, 101.1, SE = 5.4) 91.8 (80.4, 103.1, SE = 5.6) 0.82
FACT-L after 3 months (mean, lower 95% mean, upper 95% mean, SE) 99.96 (88.0, 111.85, SE = 5.74) 106.0 (93.63, 118.37, SE = 5.97) 0.07
Difference in FACT-L score between baseline and 3 months follow-up 8.18 ± 0.34 (missing = 7) 15.92 ± 0.37 (missing = 7) 0.05*

* = means comparisons for all pairs using Tukey-Kramer HSD.