TABLE 5.
The comparison of the mediating effect of the cognitive reappraisal and positive effect in the relationship between Zhongyong thinking and resilience (n = 1,356).
| Effect | Boot SE | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI | Ratio of indirect to total effect | Ratio of indirect to direct effect | |
| Total effect | 0.35 | 0.02 | 0.308 | 0.392 | − | − |
| Direct effect | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.123 | 0.194 | − | − |
| Total indirect effect | 0.19 | 0.01 | 0.165 | 0.220 | 54% | 120% |
| Mediating effect of CR | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.104 | 0.148 | 35% | 78% |
| Mediating effect of PA | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.052 | 0.082 | 19% | 42% |
CR, cognitive appraisal; PA, positive effect.
Mediating effect of CR was Zhongyong thinking→cognitive reappraisal→resilience.
Mediating effect of PA was Zhongyong thinking → positive effect → resilience.
Boot SE, Boot LLCI and Boot ULCL were estimated standard error, 95% confidence interval lower and 95% confidence interval upper through bias-corrected percentile bootstrap method used for testing indirect effects.
The 95% confidence intervals did not overlap with zero.