Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 28;3(1):65–80. doi: 10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.01.007

Table 2. Decellularisation methods for bone grafts*.

Method Advantages Drawbacks
Chemical SDS Complete removal of cellular components Damages ECM:
• Collagen disruption
• GAG reduction
Triton TnBP Good preservation of the ECM Poor cell removal efficiency
Enzymatic DNAse • Not damaging to the ECM
• Very efficient in DNA debris elimination
Difficult to wash off tissues. Works only in combination with treatment disrupting cell membranes
Trypsin Efficient cell surface removal Prolonged exposure can disrupt ECM
EDTA Disrupts cell adhesion to ECM Inefficient alone, often combined with trypsin
Mechanical Freeze/thaw Efficient disruption of cell membranes Does not efficiently remove cellular components & can damage ECM
Pressure Increases chemical exposure and debris removal in tissues High pressures can affect ECM integrity

Note: *Adapted from Blaudez et al.26 DNAse: deoxyribonuclease; ECM: extracellular matrix; EDTA: ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid;

SDS: sodium dodecyl sulfate; TnBP: tri-n-butyl phosphate.