Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 28;3(1):81–98. doi: 10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.01.008

Table 4. Common animal models for evaluation of artificial blood vessels in vivo.

Animal model Characteristics Application inner diameter (mm) Common length (mm) Longest implantation period Implantation site References
Sheep Similar cardiovascular physiology, endothelialisation mechanisms and thrombogenicity mechanisms to humans.
Suitable size and long-term studies possible.
Higher incidence of hypercoagulability.
4-6
4-6
80-100
60-100
9 months
3 months
Carotid artery
Arteriovenous graft
48, 74
129
Pig Similar vascular physiology and anatomy to humans.
Well established as a model for assessing vascular grafts.
Mount an extensive immune response to implanted tissues.
3-6
3-6
30-100
10-100
6 months
4 weeks
Iliac artery
Carotid artery
130
52
Dog Lack of spontaneous endothelialisation and immune response restricts study lengths.
Ease of accessing vessel due to thin skin.
Thrombogenicity mechanisms and vessel viscoelastic properties differ from humans.
3-6
3-6
30-50
30-50
6 months
1 year
Abdominal artery
Carotid artery
131
119
Baboon Physiology and cardiovascular anatomy are the most similar to humans.
Suitable for a wide range of non-invasive imaging techniques adapted from humans.
High cost and ethical concerns associated with using primates in medical research.
3-6 30-50 6 months Arteriovenous graft 26
Rabbit Similar endothelialisation rates and thrombogenicity mechanisms to humans.
Demanding higher anticoagulant function.
Limited to short-term studies.
1-4
1-4
1-4
5-30
5-30
5-30
12 months
2 weeks
3 months
Carotid artery
Femoral artery
Abdominal artery
94, 132
133
134
Rat Large sample size.
Wide variety of transgenic lines.
Allows exploration of genetic/molecular mechanisms.
1-3
1-3
5-30
5-10
18 months
12 weeks
Abdominal artery
Carotid artery
73, 135
136
Mouse Ideal for biocompatibility and cell infiltration studies. 0.5-1 3-10 6 months Carotid artery 137