TABLE 8.
Results of the KH testa
| Topological constraintb | In likelihood | Δlc | SD | Test statistic | Pd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [(ADEC,ABRI),(ABCB,ABMB)] | −3,427.483 | 0 | NAe | NA | NA |
| [(ADEC,ABCB),(ABRI,ABMB)] | −3,448.979 | 21.496 | 10.913 | 1.970 | 0.0491 |
| [(ADEC,ABMB),(ABRI,ABCB)] | −3,448.979 | 21.496 | 10.913 | 1.970 | 0.0491 |
| {[(ADEC,ABRI),ABCB],ABMB} | −3,429.504 | 2.021 | 2.549 | 0.793 | 0.4281 |
| {[(ADEC,ABRI),ABMB],ABCB} | −3,429.504 | 2.021 | 2.549 | 0.793 | 0.4281 |
| {[(ADEC,ABCB),ABRI],ABMB} | −3,448.979 | 21.496 | 10.913 | 1.970 | 0.0491 |
| {[(ADEC,ABCB),ABMB],ABRI} | −3,448.177 | 20.694 | 10.175 | 2.034 | 0.0421 |
| {[(ADEC,ABMB),ABRI],ABCB} | −3,448.979 | 21.496 | 10.913 | 1.970 | 0.0491 |
| {[(ADEC,ABMB),ABCB],ABRI} | −3,448.177 | 20.694 | 10.175 | 2.034 | 0.0421 |
| {[(ABCB,ABRI),ADEC],ABMB} | −3,448.979 | 21.496 | 10.913 | 1.970 | 0.0491 |
| {[(ABCB,ABRI),ABMB],ADEC} | −3,447.920 | 20.437 | 10.082 | 2.027 | 0.0428 |
| {[(ABMB,ABRI),ABCB],ADEC} | −3,447.920 | 20.437 | 10.082 | 2.027 | 0.0428 |
| {[(ABMB,ABRI),ADEC],ABCB} | −3,448.979 | 21.496 | 10.913 | 1.970 | 0.0491 |
| {[(ABCB,ABMB),ADEC],ABRI} | −3,428.629 | 1.146 | 1.705 | 0.672 | 0.5016 |
| {[(ABCB,ABMB),ABRI],ADEC} | −3,428.629 | 1.146 | 1.705 | 0.672 | 0.5016 |
a
ML tree estimation was performed with the combined data set by using the topological constraints indicated and the GTR+Γ substitution model.
b
For an explanation of the taxon abbreviations see Table 5.
c
Likelihood difference compared to the optimal ML tree.
d
Probability of getting a more extreme test statistic under the assumption of no difference between the null hypothesis and the optimal ML tree according to the KH test (25) as implemented in PAUP* (38). Values less than 0.05 are indicated by boldface type.
e
NA, not applicable.