Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Jan 14;23(7):1171–1177. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.030

Table 2.

Agitated behaviors at baseline and at end of four-months follow-up among residents from intervention and control nursing homes

Overall Baseline n=976 Overall Follow-up n=976 Intervention Baseline n=483 Intervention Follow-up n=483 Control Baseline n=493 Control Follow-up n=493 Marginal Interaction Effect (SE) [95% CI]
Total CMAI score, Mean (SE) Source: Staff Interview 50.16 (2.93) [44.14,55.91] 49.17 (0.97) [47.27,51.06] 50.64 (3.06) [44.65,56.63] 50.31 (1.35) [47.66,52.97] 49.70 (3.06) [43.71,55.69] 48.04 (1.35) [45.40,50.68] 1.33 (1.38) [−1.37,4.03]
Total ARBS score, Mean (SE) Source: Minimum Data Set 0.45 (0.20) [0.06,0.84] 0.41 (0.05) [0.31,0.52] 0.52 (0.21) [0.12, 0.92] 0.42 (0.08) [0.28,0.57] 0.39 (0.21) [0.00,0.79] 0.40 (0.08) [0.25,0.55] −0.11 (0.1) [−0.30,0.08]

Abbreviations: CMAI, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory; ARBS, Agitated and Reactive Behavior Scale; SE, standard error; MIE, marginal interaction effect – the marginal interaction of follow-up by intervention effect

Fixed effect covariates: age, sex, race, activities of daily living score, cognitive function score, psychotic disorder, bipolar disease, depression, anxiety, dementia, anti-depressant use, anti-anxietal use, antipsychotic use, nursing home corporation, time from MDS collection to CMAI score*, baseline ARBS*, baseline CMAI†, indicator of baseline/follow-up score, treatment group, interaction of baseline/follow-up measure and treatment group

Random effects: random intercept for nursing home, random intercept for the interaction of baseline/follow-up measure and nursing home, random intercept for data collector*, random intercept for individual *exclusive to CMAI model, †exclusive to ARBS and ARBS-CMAI model