Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 1;50:101534. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101534

Table 1.

Predictors of patient survival deemed significant or unspecified by included studies.

Predictor Category Timepoint Studies which Predictor was Significant Predictor(s) Significant on AnalysisNo p-value provided, but deemed significant by studyANo p-value provided, nor deemed significant by studyB Control/Reference Group HR (95% CI) P-value
Recipient Age at Transplant Overall Nagai (2019)14
Dimou (2016)15
Haldar (2019)16
McCabe (2020)17
Agbim (2019)18
Kaswala (2020)19
Henson (2020)20
Rinella (2022)21
Shavelle (2022)22
Yuan (2022)23
60–64 years
65–69 years
70+ years
50–64A
≥65a
61–65
>65
50–64
>65
Age at transplant: continuous
Age at transplant: continuous
Age at transplant: continuousB
>65
Age at transplant: continuous
Age at transplant: continuous
Vs. <50
Vs. <50
Vs. <50
Vs. <50
Vs. <50
Vs. ≤45
Vs. ≤45
Vs. <50
Vs. <50
NR
NR
NR
Vs. <55
Continuous
Continuous
1.66 (1.31–2.11)
2.08 (1.63–2.64)
2.66 (1.98–3.57)
1.27 (1.01–1.59)
2.02 (1.58–2.58)
2.07 (1.39–3.08)
1.72 (1.10–2.81)
1.54 (1.29–1.84)
2.14 (1.74–2.64)
1.04 (1.03–1.05)
1.02 (1.01–1.03)
NR
1.70 (1.04–2.77)
1.04 (NR)
1.24 (1.17–1.32)
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
NR
NR
<0.001
<0.05
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
NR
0.04
<0.0001
<0.001
1 year Nagai (2019)14 50–59
60–64
65–69
70+
Vs. <50
Vs. <50
Vs. <50
Vs. <50
1.61 (1.13–2.3)
1.85 (1.29–2.66)
2.45 (1.7–3.52)
2.95 (1.92–4.54)
0.008
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
5 years Henson (2020)20
Karnam (2022)24
Age at transplantB: continuous
Age at transplant: continuous
Continuous
Continuous
NR
1.02 (1.01–1.03)
NR
<0.00001
Ethnicity Overall Nagai (2019)14
Ochoa–Allemant (2020)25
Rinella (2022)21
Yuan (2022)23
Ethnicity: Asian
Ethnicity: HispanicA
Ethnicity: Black
Ethnicity: Hispanic/Latino
Ethicity: Asian
Vs. white
Vs. non-Hispanic
Vs. white
Vs. white
Vs. white
0.38 (0.2–0.75)
0.84 (0.71–0.99)
5.25 (2.12–12.96)
0.78 (0.68–0.89)
0.67 (0.46–0.97)
0.05
NR
0.0003
<0.001
0.03
Functional Status Overall Nagai (2019)14
McCabe (2020)17
Shavelle (2022)22
Karnosfky score: 10%–30%
KPS 3 (40–50%)
KPS 4 (10–30%)
Karnosfky score: 0–60%
Vs. 70%–100%
Vs. KPS 1 (80–100%)
Vs. KPS 1 (80–100%)
Vs. 70–100%
1.7 (1.36–2.13)
1.52 (1.29–1.80)
2.13 (1.8–2.52)
1.57 (NR)
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
5 years Henson (2020)20
Karnam (2022)24
Functional status (age ≥65 only subgroup):
Some assistanceC
Total assistanceD
Functional status:
Some assistanceC
Total assistanceD
Vs. No assistanceE
Vs. No AssistanceE
Vs. No assistanceE
Vs. No AssistanceE
1.17 (0.81–1.69)
1.72 (1.18–2.5)
1.16 (1.02–1.32)
1.30 (1.13–1.50)
0.003
0.003
0.03
0.0003
Recipient HCC+ Overall Nagai (2019)14
McCabe (2020)17
Kaswala (2020)19
Yuan (2022)23
HCC+
HCC+
HCC+
HCC+
Vs. no HCC
Vs. no HCC
Vs. no HCC
Vs. no HCC
1.25 (1.04–1.5)
1.23 (1.08–1.41)
1.37 (1.19–1.58)
1.19 (1.08–1.32)
0.02
0.002
<0.001
<0.001
Recipient MELD at Transplant Overall Dimou (2016)15
Haldar (2019)16
Kaswala (2020)19
Henson (2020)20
Shavelle (2022)22
30–39A
≥40a
>23
MELD score: overallY
MELD score: overallY (age ≥65 only subgroup)
25–40
Vs. <20
Vs. <20
Vs. <11
NR
NR
Vs. 6–10
1.86 (1.53–2.23)
2.0 (1.49–2.69)
1.48 (1.04–2.3)
1.01 (1.01–1.02)
1.02 (1.01–1.03)
1.38 (NR)
NR
NR
<0.05
<0.001
0.004
0.01
Recipient Diabetes Mellitus pre-LT Overall Nagai (2019)14
Dimou (2016)15
Agbim (2019)18
Shavelle (2022)22
Yuan (2022)23
DM+
DM+A
DM+
DM+
DM+
Vs. no DM
Vs. no DM
NR
Vs. no DM
Vs. no DM
1.14 (1.01–1.29)
1.26 (1.09–1.45)
1.13 (0.99–1.29)
1.18 (NR)
1.18 (1.09–1.29)
0.04
NR
<0.001
0.004
<0.001
Recipient BMI Overall Nagai (2019)14
Dimou (2016)15
Haldar (2019)16
Agopian (2012)26
Shavelle (2022)
Yuan (2022)23
30–34.9
35–39.9
25–29a
30–34a
35–39a
≥40a
≤18.5
>18.5, ≤25.0
>40
>35
25–30
≥30
Continuous
Vs. 18.5–24.9
Vs. 18.5–24.9
Vs. <25
Vs. <25
Vs. <25
Vs. <25
>25.0,≤30.0
>25.0, ≤30.0
>25.0, ≤30.0
<35
Vs. 18–25
Vs. 18–25
Continuous
0.73 (0.6–0.89)
0.82 (0.66–1.01)
0.7 (0.56–0.88)
0.7 (0.56–0.88)
0.75 (0.59–0.95)
0.73 (0.55–0.98)
4.29 (1.01–18.21)
2.24 (1.27–3.96)
1.96 (1.16–3.32)
2.3 (NR)
0.7 (NR)
0.69 (NR)
0.99 (0.98–0.99)
<0.001
0.06
NR
NR
NR
NR
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
0.039
0.01
<0.01
<0.001
10 years Satapathy (2020)27 25 to <30
≥30 to <35
≥35 to <40
≥40
Vs. ≥18 to <25
Vs. ≥18 to <25
Vs. ≥18 to <25
Vs. ≥18 to <25
0.62 (0.48–0.79)
0.68 (0.54–0.87)
0.66 (0.51–0.86)
0.64 (0.46–0.89)
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.007
Dialysis Prior to LT Overall Agopian (2012)26
Zhang (2019)28
Henson (2020)20
Shavelle (2022)22
Yuan (2022)23
Dialysis prior to LT
Dialysis prior to LT
Dialysis prior to LT (age ≥65 only subgroup)
Dialysis 1 week prior to LT
Dialysis 1 week prior to LT
Vs. no dialysis
Vs. no dialysis
Vs. no dialysis
Vs. no dialysis
Vs. no dialysis
2.5 (NR)
1.4 (1.07–1.84)
1.74 (1.24–2.44)
1.86 (NR)
1.53 (1.36–1.71)
0.029
0.015
0.001
<0.0001
<0.001
5 years Karnam (2022)24 Dialysis 1 week prior to LT Vs. no dialysis 2.10 (1.66–2.66) <0.00001
Hepatic Encephalopathy Overall Nagai (2019)14
Kaswala (2020)19
Shavelle (2022)22
Hepatic encephalopathy (grade III & IV)
Hepatic encephalopathy:
Grade I & II
Grade III & IV
Hepatic encephalopathy:
Grade I & II
Grade III & IV
NR
Vs. none
Vs. none
Vs. none
Vs. none
1.31 (1.11–1.56)
1.16 (1.01–1.34)
1.74 (1.43–2.12)
1.20 (NR)
1.79 (NR)
0.002
0.02
<0.001
0.009
<0.0001
5 years Karnam (2022)24 Hepatic encephalopathy Vs. none 1.15 (1.00–1.31) 0.04
Ventilatory support or ICU at LTX Overall Zhang (2019)28
Shavelle (2022)22
Shavelle (2022)22
Hospitalized not ICU at LT
Not hospitalized at LT
Hospitalized not ICU at LT
Hospitalized and ICU at LT
Ventilator at LT
Vs. ICU at LT
Vs. ICU at LT
Vs. not hospitalized
Vs. not hospitalized
Vs. no ventilator
0.74 (0.57–0.96)
0.6 (0.45–0.78)
1.50 (NR)
2.23 (NR)
2.05 (NR)
0.022
0.001
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
5 years Karnam (2022)24 Ventilator at LT Vs. no ventilator 1.33 (1.05–1.69) 0.019
Era/year of LTX Overall Nagai (2019)14
Kaswala (2020)19
Shavelle (2022)22
Yuan (2022)23
Era/year of LT: 2014–2015
Year of transplant
Year of transplant: continuous
Year of LT: 2010–2014
Year of LT: 2015–2019
Vs. 2008–2010
NR
Continuous
2004–2009
2004–2009
0.8 (0.66–0.96)
0.97 (0.96–0.99)
0.97 (NR)
0.79 (0.70–0.87)
0.77 (0.69–0.87)
0.02
0.02
0.0008
<0.001
<0.001
Re–transplantationX Overall Nagai (2019)14 Retransplantation First time transplant 1.75 (1.16–2.65) 0.01
Serum bilirubin Overall Agbim (2019)18 TSB NR 1.02 (1.01–1.02) <0.001
Portal vein thrombosis Overall Agbim (2019)18
Shavelle (2022)22
Yuan (2022)23
PVT+
PVT+
PVT+
Vs. no PVT
Vs. no PVT
Vs. no PVT
1.31 (1.09–1.58)
1.22 (NR)
1.24 (1.12–1.37)
<0.001
0.01
<0.001
Every 90d on wait listX Overall Zhang (2019)28 Every 90d on waitlist NR 1.04 (1.01–1.07) 0.017
Cold ischemia time Overall Henson (2020)20
Yuan (2022)23
Cold ischemia time (recipient age ≥65 subgroup)
Cold ischemia time (hours)- continuous
NR
Continuous
1.06 (1.01–1.1)
1.02 (1.01–1.03)
0.01
0.007
Post-LT biopsy steatosis 1 year Malik (2009)29 Post-LT biopsy steatosis Vs. Non-steatosis N/A (% analysis, not regression) 0.01
Recipient Sex Overall McCabe (2020)17
Haldar (2019)16
Rinella (2022)21
Male
Male
Male
Vs. Female
Vs. Female
Vs. Female
1.19 (1.07–1.32)
0.79 (0.63–0.98)
1.27 (0.92–1.75)
<0.001
<0.05
0.15
Recipient ESRDX Overall Rinella (2022)21 ESRD Vs. no ESRD 1.55 (1.04–2.31) 0.03
Pre-LT Atrial FibrillationX Overall Rinella (2022)21 Atrial fibrillation Vs. no atrial fibrillation 1.95 (1.06–3.57) 0.03
Post-LT HTNX Overall Rinella (2022)21 Post-LT HTN Vs. no HTN post-LT 0.55 (0.37–0.79) 0.002
Immunosuppr-
essionX
Overall Rinella (2022)21 Non-calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) regimen Vs. CNI alone 2.05 (1.19–3.51) 0.009
Length of Hospital StayX Overall Shavelle (2022)22
Yuan (2022)23
11–30 days
31+ days
30 day interval
Vs. 0–10 days
Vs. 0–10 days
NR
1.22 (NR)
2.40 (NR)
1.20 (1.18–1.22)
0.002
<0.0001
<0.001
DCD Donor Overall Nagai (2019)14 DCD Donor NR 1.46 (1.16–1.86) 0.001
Donor age at death Overall Agopian (2012)26
Yuan (2022)23
Donor age at death/donation >55y
Donor age (10 year interval)
NR
NR
2.3 (NR)
1.03 (1.00–1.05)
0.024
0.03
Donor blood group Overall Haldar (2019)16 Donor Blood group: B Vs. A 0.37 (0.22=0.63) <0.001
Donor sex Overall Henson (2020)20
Haldar (2019)16
Nagai (2019)14
Male (age ≥65)
Male
Female
Vs. Female (age ≥65)
Vs. Female
Vs. Male
0.8 (0.54–1.0)
0.97 (0.78–1.2)
1.1 (0.97–1.25)
0.05
NS
0.12
C

Some assistance needed = “some dependance” or KPS 50%–70%.

D

Full assistance needed = “total dependance” or KPS 10%–40%.

E

No assistance = “no dependance” or Karnosky Performance Status 80%–100%.

X

Not an a priori determined variable- added in during data extraction.

Y

At listing.