Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 18;29(8):103338. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103338

Table 2.

Characteristics of the molecular typing methods for epidemiological and evolutionary studies of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine intramammary infections.

Molecular methods Characteristics
R T DP EU TR Int Cost HT Reference
RAPD-PCR Limited to poor High Moderate to good Easy Quick Complex Low High Morandi et al., 2010, Fitzgerald et al., 1997, Kosecka-Strojek et al., 2016, Gurjar et al., 2012, Myllys et al., 1997, Su et al., 1999
AFLP High High Moderate Easy Quick Complex High High Salasia et al., 2011, Boerema et al., 2006
PCR-RFLP High High Moderate to good Easy Quick Simple Low Hakimi Alni et al., 2018; Morandi et al., 2010; Dendani Chadi et al., 2016; Raimundo et al., 1999; Su et al., 1999; Hata et al., 2010
RS-PCR High High Moderate to good Easy Quick Simple Moderate High Adkins et al., 2016, Ben Said et al., 2016, Boss et al., 2016, Cremonesi et al., 2015, Fournier et al., 2008, Graber et al., 2013; Monistero et al., 2018
agr NA NA NA Easy Quick Simple NA NA Bonsaglia et al., 2018, Mitra et al., 2013
MLVA High High Good Easy Quick Complex Moderate High Bergonier et al., 2014, Ikawaty et al., 2009, Morandi et al., 2010, Sobral et al., 2012, Van Duijkeren et al., 2014, Kosecka-Strojek et al., 2016
Ribotyping Good High Limited Difficult Time consuming Complex High NA Aarestrup et al., 1995, Myllys et al., 1997, Duarte et al., 2015, Pereira et al., 2002, Buzzola et al., 2001, Fitzgerald et al., 1997, Su et al., 1999
PFGE Moderate To goud High Excellent Difficult Time consuming Complex High Low Adkins et al., 2016, Ikawaty et al., 2009, McMillan et al., 2016, Srednik et al., 2018, Cremonesi et al., 2015, Dendani Chadi et al., 2010, Zadoks and Schukken, 2006, Lakhundi and Zhang, 2018, Kroning et al., 2018
MLST High High Good Difficult Time-consuming Simple High Low McMillan et al., 2016, Smith et al., 2005a, Smith et al., 2005b, Boss et al., 2016, Stefani et al., 2012, Ji, 2020, Rabello et al., 2007, Silva et al., 2014
spa Excellent High Excellent Easy Quick Simple Low High Bonsaglia et al., 2018, Hasman et al., 2010, Kosecka-Strojek et al., 2016, Mitra et al., 2013, Käppeli et al., 2019, Sobral et al., 2012
SCCmec NA Low NA Difficult Time-consuming Complex High High Butaye et al., 2016, Li et al., 2017, Carretto et al., 2018
WGS High High Excellent Difficult Time consuming Complex High High Kosecka-Strojek et al., 2016, Schmidt et al., 2017, Fursova et al., 2020, Naushad et al., 2020, Fisher and Paterson, 2020
Microarray assay High High Excellent Difficult Time consuming Complex High High Lisowska-Łysiak et al., 2018, El-Sayed et al., 2017, Käppeli et al., 2019, Szabó, 2014

Abbreviations; R: Reproducibility; T: Typeability; DP: Discriminatory power; EU: Ease of use; TR: Time required; Int: Interpretation; HT: High throughput; NA: not available; RAPD‐PCR: Random amplification of polymorphic DNA; AFLP: Amplified fragment length polymorphism; PCR-RFLP: Restriction fragment length polymorphism; RS-PCR: Ribosomal spacer; agr: Accessory gene regulator; MLVA: Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis; PFGE: Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; MLST: Multi-locus sequence typing; spa: Staphylococcal protein A; SCCmec: Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec; WGS: Whole genome sequencing;