Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 28;116(1):230–243. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac074

TABLE 1.

Association between TMAO concentrations and health outcomes and evidence class for meta-analyses1

Outcomes Population Study design Comparison Studies, n Cases, n Participants, n Metric Random-effects RR/HR/OR/WMD (95% CI) P value 95% PI Egger's P2 I 2,3 % P value for excess significance test4 Evidence class5
Cardiovascular outcomes
 CVD CVD/non-CVD CC/CS High vs. low 12 5276 22,945 OR 1.50 (1.26, 1.79) 8.00E−06 0.92, 2.44 0.000 63.97 0.16 III
 Hypertension Healthy/hypertension CO/CC/CS High vs. low 15 10,293 18,854 RR 1.39 (1.22, 1.57) 3.47E−07 0.97, 1.99 0.201 70.99 NP II
 MACE CKD/CVD/DM CO/CC/CS High vs. low 36 >7070 39,314 HR 1.74 (1.55, 1.95) 1.13E−22 1.07, 2.82 0.011 65.59 0.00 II
 Stroke Stroke/CVD/DM CO/CC/CS High vs. low 9 2546 9393 OR 2.88 (1.54, 5.39) 9.35E−04 0.44, 18.81 0.439 91.54 NP III
Mortality
 All-cause mortality General/CVD/CKD/DM CO High vs. low 37 >10,510 44,480 HR 1.60 (1.43, 1.79) 8.33E−16 0.91, 2.82 0.000 83.63 0.10 II
 CVD mortality CVD/non-CVD CO/CC High vs. low 8 >1002 11,296 HR 2.02 (1.74, 2.34) 6.01E−21 1.74, 2.34 0.480 0.00 0.24 II
Blood pressure and cardiometabolic biomarkers
 SBP General/DM/CVD/stroke CO/CC/CS High vs. low 16 NA 17,369 WMD 1.92 (1.33, 2.51) 1.70E−10 0.74, 3.10 0.530 32.42 0.45 IV
 DBP General/DM/CVD/stroke CO/CC/CS High vs. low 14 NA 10,085 WMD −0.25 (−0.95, 0.46) 0.495 −2.07, 1.57 0.338 79.15 0.85 NS
 BMI General/DM/CVD/stroke CO/CC/CS High vs. low 19 NA 20,851 WMD 0.54 (0.12, 0.97) 0.012 −1.11, 2.20 0.954 96.13 0.18 IV
 HDL cholesterol General/DM/CVD/stroke CO/CC/CS High vs. low 15 NA 21,481 WMD −0.44 (−1.59, 0.71) 0.453 −4.42, 3.54 0.151 94.91 NP NS
 LDL cholesterol General/DM/CVD/stroke CO/CC/CS High vs. low 15 NA 20,504 WMD −1.09 (−2.62, 0.44) 0.164 −5.31, 3.14 0.286 87.44 0.70 NS
 TC General/DM/CVD/stroke CO/CC/CS High vs. low 15 NA 16,523 WMD −0.57 (−1.14, −0.01) 0.047 −2.16, 1.02 0.513 88.65 0.65 IV
 CRP General/DM/CVD/stroke CO/CS High vs. low 11 NA 12,233 WMD 0.27 (0.06, 0.48) 0.012 −0.27, 0.81 0.112 86.11 NP IV
 Triglycerides General/DM/CVD CO/CC/CS High vs. low 14 NA 16,219 WMD 0.15 (−0.36, 0.65) 0.566 −0.83, 1.13 0.000 60.02 0.76 NS
Diabetes mellitus
 Diabetes CVD/diabetes/renal disease CO/CC/CS High vs. low 18 >5554 22,999 OR 1.75 (1.42, 2.16) 1.50E−07 0.83, 3.70 0.886 82.05 0.10 II
 GDM GDM/non-GDM CC High vs. low 3 952 2180 OR 2.24 (1.72, 2.93) 3.08E−09 1.71, 2.94 0.240 0.94 0.78 IV
Renal outcomes
 GFR CKD/general CO/CC/CS High vs. low 20 NA 29,497 WMD −13.30 (−16.73, −9.86) 3.14E−14 −28.65, 2.05 0.724 97.92 0.76 II
Cancer
 CRC CRC/non-CRC CC High vs. low 3 1058 2291 OR 1.49 (1.19, 1.88) 5.93E−04 1.11, 2.00 0.194 21.72 0.65 III
1

CC, case–control study; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CO, cohort study; CRC, colorectal cancer; CRP, C-reactive protein; CS, cross-sectional study; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DM, diabetes mellitus; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; NA, not available; NP, not pertinent (because the number of expected significant studies was larger than the number of observed significant studies); NS, not significant; PI, prediction interval; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; WMD, weighted mean difference.

2

Egger's regression test was used to evaluate the small-study effects.

3

Interstudy heterogeneity was tested using the Cochran Q statistic (t2) at a significance level of P < 0.10 and quantified by the I2 statistic. An I2 value ≥50% is considered to indicate substantial heterogeneity. All results are presented as RR/OR/HR/WMD with 95% CIs, using the Mantel–Haenszel method with a random-effects model.

4

Excess significance test was conducted to investigate whether the observed number of studies with significant results differed from the expected number of significant studies using the χ2 test.

5

Evidence class criteria: class I (convincing): statistical significance with P < 10−6, >1000 cases (or >20,000 participants for continuous outcomes), the largest component study reported a statistically significant effect (P < 0.05), 95% PI excluded the null, no large heterogeneity (I2 < 50%), no evidence of small-study effects (P > 0.10) or excess significance bias (P > 0.10); class II (highly suggestive): statistical significance with P < 10−6, >1000 cases (or >20,000 participants for continuous outcomes), the largest component study reported a statistically significant effect (P < 0.05); class III (suggestive): statistical significance with P < 10−3, >1000 cases (or >20,000 participants for continuous outcomes); class IV (weak): the remaining statistically significant associations with P < 0.05.