Skip to main content
. 2022 May 31;7(6):414–421. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0026

Table 1.

Summary of the data extraction from the nine included studies. Data within parentheses are CIs if not stated otherwise.

Simony et al. (33)* Grauers et al. (5) Andersen et al. (6)* Inoue et al. (32) Kesling & Reinker (31) Carr (30) Fisher & DeGeorge (29) Tang et al. (7) Yang et al. (22)
Study type (twin/family) Twin Twin Twin Twin Twin Twin Twin Family Family
Study size 21 pairs 526 pairsa 135 pairs 21 pairs 5 pairsb 6 pairs 14 pairs 1149 individuals 2732 individuals
Country of origin for study Denmark Sweden Denmark Japan USA UK USA HongKong China
Scoliosis diagnosis Radiographs Self-assessment Self-assessment Radiographs Radiographs Radiographs Radiographs Radiographs Radiographs
Zygosity determined by DNA Question-naire Question-naire DNA Blood chemistry DNA Blood chemistry, clinical
Data on curve size available Partly No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Concordance for monozygotic twins (pairwise) 0.40 (0.10 to 0.70) 0.11 0.13 (0.05 to 0.27) 0.92 0.50c 0.67 1.00d
Concordance for monozygotic twins (probandwise) 0.45 (0.16 to 0.74) 0.17 0.25 (0.17 to 0.37) 0.96c 0.33c 0.33c 0.50c, d
Concordance for dizygotic twins (pairwise) 0.05 (−0.05 to 0.15) 0.04 0.00 (0.00 to 0.03) 0.62 1.0c 0.0 0.57d
Concordance for dizygotic twins (probandwise) 0.10 (−0.03 to 0.23) 0.08 0.00 0.77c 0.5c 0.0c 0.36c, d
Tetrachoric correlations for monozygotic twins (dichotomous trait) 0.41 (0.33 to 0.49)
Tetrachoric correlations for dizygotic twins (dichotomous trait) 0.19 (0.09 to 0.29)
Correlations for monozygotic twins (continuous trait) 0.84 (0.53 to 0.95) 0.49 (−0.56 to 0.94)c
Correlations for dizygotic twins (continuous trait) 0.52 (−0.32 to 0.90) −0.96 (−0.99 to −0.70)c
Broad sense heritability 0.70c 0.44c 0.13c 0.79c 0.67c 1.0c
Narrow sense heritability 0.38 (s.e.= 0.10) 0.88 (s.e. = 0.11) 0.49 (s.e. = 0.03)
Quality assessment Good Fair Fair Fair Fair Good Good Good Fair

*These studies partly overlap; aAdditional cohort with 152 twin pairs with separately presented data. MZ pairwise concordance 0.08, DZ pairwise concordance 0; bFive pairs with available data; cCalculated data (see methods section); dConcordance rate calculated with 10 degree Cobb as threshold for affected.