Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 21;11(3):170–185. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00044

Supplementary Table 1.

Study quality assessment of included studies

Study Selection Comparability
Factors comparable between the groups
Outcome Score Maximum=8 Quality High >6, medium 4-6, low ≤3


Representativeness of the average adult in community Cohort size Information on clinical outcomes Outcome not present at start Adequate clinical assessment Follow-up time Adequacy of follow-up
Pai et al., 2015 0.5 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium
Lakhtakia et al., 2016 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium
Choi et al., 2018 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium
De La Sena et al., 2018 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium
Thosani et al., 2018 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 6.5 High
Fathima et al., 2019 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium
De Nucci et al., 2019 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium
Oleinikov et al., 2019 0.5 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium
Dancour et al., 2019 0.5 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium
Barthet et al., 2019 0.5 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium
Trosic-Ivanisevic et al., 2019 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium
Younis et al., 2019 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium
Malikowski et al., 2020 0.5 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6.5 High
Levy et al., 2012 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium
Park et al., 2015 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 5.5 Medium
Yang et al., 2015 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium
Qin et al., 2016 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium
Paik et al., 2016 0.5 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6.5 Medium
Choi et al., 2018 0 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 6.5 High
Matsumoto et al., 2020 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Medium