Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 21;11(3):170–185. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00044

Table 1.

Data on study, population characteristics, and assessed outcomes included in the meta-analysis

Author, year Type of study Intervention Age (years)a Number of patients Total number of lesions Functioning Nonfunctioning Female Mean size (mm)a Total number of sessions
Pai et al., 2015 Prospective RFA 69.5±12.5 2 2 2 27.5±17.7 3
Lakhtakia et al., 2016 Prospective RFA 45±4.96 3 3 3 0 0 13±5.5 3
Choi et al., 2018 Prospective RFA 55±30.6 8 8 1 7 4 19.3±6.7 14
De La Serna et al., 2018 Prospective RFA 67.3±7.7 3 3 NR NR 0 16.1±6.3 6
Thosani et al., 2018 Retrospective RFA NR 3 3 3 0 NR 23 5
Fathima et al., 2019 Prospective RFA NR 15 18 13 5 NR 13.6 17
De Nucci et al., 2019 Prospective RFA 78.6 10 11 3 8 4 14.5 (9-24) 11
Oleinikov et al., 2019 Prospective RFA 60.4±14.4 18 25 8 19 8 14.3±7.3 18
Dancour et al., 2019 Prospective RFA 53.5±11.5 8 8 8 0 4 15.31±1.94 8
Barthet et al., 2019 Prospective RFA 59.9 (45-47) 12 14 0 14 5 13.1 (10-20) 14
Trosic-Ivanisevic et al., 2019 Retrospective RFA NR 7 7 3 4 NR 11.8 (7.4-18) 7
Younis et al., 2019 Prospective RFA 73.5 3 3 0 3 NR 10 (7-16) 3
Malikowski et al., 2020 Prospective RFA 68.4±8.7 8 8 3 5 5 21.9±15.5 9
Levy et al., 2012 Prospective Ethanol 66.3±14.9 5 5 5 5 4 15±4.17 11
Park et al., 2015 Prospective Ethanol 52.5±20.5 11 14 4 4 6 12.3±3.2 18
Yang et al., 2015 Prospective Ethanol 59 4 4 4 4 NR N/A 5
Qin et al., 2016 Prospective Ethanol 45.3±10.5 17 17 17 17 9 13.2±6.2 27
Paik et al., 2016 Prospective Ethanol 60±27 6 6 4 4 2 11.3±3.7 6
Choi et al., 2018 Prospective Ethanol 56.5±12.7 33 40 1 1 20 11 (range 7-20) 63
Matsumoto et al., 2020 Prospective Ethanol 62.4±7.9 5 5 0 0 3 10.2±2.5 8


Author, year Location Ethanol volume per session (mL)a, concentration (%) Technical success Clinical success Total follow-up duration (months)a Adverse events Acute pancreatitis Abdominal pain Others

Pai et al., 2015 2 head NA 3 2 3-6 0 0 0 0
Lakhtakia et al., 2016 2 head, 1 body NA 3 3 11-12 0 0 0 0
Choi et al., 2018 3 head, 5 body NA 14 6 13 2 1 1 0
De La Serna et al., 2018 1 head, 2 body NA 6 1 3-16 0 0 0 0
Thosani et al., 2018 NR NA 5 3 5 NR NR NR NR
Fathima et al., 2019 NR NA 17 15 6-60 2 1 1 0
De Nucci et al., 2019 3 head, 6 body, 2 tail NA 11 11 12 0 0 0 0
Oleinikov et al., 2019 5 uncinate, 10 head, 8 body, 2 tail NA 18 25 2-27 0 2 0 0
Dancour et al., 2019 3 uncinate, 2 head, 2 body, 1 tail NA 8 8 1.5-21 0 0 0 0
Barthet et al., 2019 3 head, 6 body, 5 tail NA 14 12 12 2 1 1 0
Trosic-Ivanisevic et al., 2019 2 uncinate, 3 neck, 2 body NA 7 6 43876 4 0 3 1 (pancreatic fistula)
Younis et al., 2019 NR NA 3 1 0 1 0
Malikowski et al., 2020 6 head, 1 neck, 1 body NA 9 8 1 1 0 0 0
Levy et al., 2012 3 head, 1 body, 1 tail 1.2±1.7, 95%-98% 11 4 17.3±11.5 0 0 0 0
Park et al., 2015 1 uncinate, 6 head, 7 body/tail median 1.6 (range, 0.5-3.8), 99% 18 92 14.8±8.1 5 3 2 0
Yang et al., 2015 NR 3.1, 98% 5 3 17.3 0 0 0 0
Qin et al., 2016 5 head, 2 neck, 4 body, 6 tail Mean 1.0 (range, 0.4-1.05 mL), NR 27 17 1-21 0 0 0 0
Paik et al., 2016 4 head, 2 body 2.4±1.4, 99% 6 5 16.5 (range, 5.4-55.3) 3 1 1 1 Fever
Choi et al., 2018 23 uncinate/head, 17 body/tail 1.1 (0.8-1.9), 99% 63 24 42 (median 39-46) 2 2 0 0
Matsumoto et al., 2020 2 head, 1 body, 2 tail 0.7±0.2, 100% 8 4 12 0 0 0 0

a Values are reported as mean±SD or median (range) or range; b1 patient lost to follow-up. RFA: Radiofrequency ablation; NR: Not reported; NA: Not applicable; SD: Standard deviation