Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 28;11(3):223–230. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00031

Table 2.

Outcome summary comparing EUS-CD to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in the overall cohort (n=86) and in the subgroup of patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction (n=69)

Outcomes Overall cohort (n=86) Malignant distal biliary obstruction only (n=69)


EUS-CD (n=28) PTBD (n=58) P EUS-CD (n=23) PTBD (n=46) P
Technical success, n (%) 28 (100) 56 (96.6) 0.3 23 (100) 45 (97.8) 0.48
Clinical success, n (%) 22 (84.6) 36 (62.1) 0.04 17 (81) 32 (69.6) 0.33
Adverse events, n (%) 4 (14.3) 17 (29.3) 0.1 3 (13) 13 (28.3) 0.16
 Occlusion 1 (3.6) 6 (10.3) 0.3 1 (4.3) 6 (13) 0.26
 Cholangitis 3 (10.7) 7 (12.1) 0.85 2 (8.7) 5 (10.9) 0.78
 Migration 0 4 (6.9) 0.16 0 4 (8.7) 0.15
 Perforation 0 1 (1.7) 0.49 0 1 (2.2) 0.48
 Bile leak 2 (7.1) 2 (3.5) 0.45 2 (8.7) 1 (2.2) 0.2
 Bleeding 0 3 (5.2) 0.2 0 2 (4.4) 0.31
Need for reintervention, n (%) 3 (10.7) 45 (77.6) <0.001 2 (8.7) 35 (76.1) <0.001
Time for reintervention (days), mean±SD* 268 (315) 64 (261) <0.001 357.5 (74.2) 74 (295) <0.001
Number of reinterventions, mean±SD 0.14 (0.45) 1.9 (2.1) <0.001 0.13 (0.45) 2 (2.3) <0.001
Death, n (%) 16 (57.1) 47 (81) 0.02 15 (65.2) 45 (97.8) <0.001

*Among patients with malignant obstruction. EUS-CD: EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy; PTBD: Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage; SD: Standard deviation