Table 2.
Summary of final panel judgements compared with IWGDF judgements for all IWGDF prevention recommendations
| No. | Problem | Desirable effects |
Undesirable effects |
Quality of evidence | Values | Balance of effects |
Acceptability | Applicability/ feasibility |
Decision | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
+ Yes |
+ Moderate |
+ Trivial |
- Low |
? Probably no important uncertainty |
+ Favours the intervention |
+ Yes |
+ Yes |
Adapt | Adapted QoE |
| 2 |
+ Yes |
+ Moderate |
+ Trivial |
- Low |
? Probably no important uncertainty |
+ Favours the intervention |
+ Yes |
+ Yes |
Adapt | Adapted QoE |
| 3 | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | Adopt | Adopted in ADAPTE screening |
| 4 | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | Adopt | Adopted in ADAPTE screening |
| 5 | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | Adopt | Adopted in ADAPTE screening |
| 6 |
+ Yes |
+ Moderate |
- Moderate |
+ Moderate |
+ Possibly important uncertainty |
? Probably favours the intervention |
? Probably yes |
- No |
Adapt | Adapted wording to reflect that the technology is not yet available in Australia |
| 7 | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | Adopt | Adopted in ADAPTE screening |
| 8 | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | Adopt | Adopted in ADAPTE screening |
| 9 | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | Adopt | Adopted in ADAPTE screening |
| 10 | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | Adopt | Adopted in ADAPTE screening |
| 11 |
+ Yes |
+ Moderate |
+ Small |
+ Low |
+ Probably no important uncertainty |
+ Probably favours the intervention |
+ Varies |
+ Varies |
Adapt | Adapted wording to retain meaning, but improve clarity |
| 12 |
+ Yes |
+ Moderate |
+ Moderate |
+ Low |
+ Probably no important uncertainty |
+ Probably favours the intervention |
+ Probably yes |
+ Probably yes |
Adapt | Adapted wording to retain meaning, but improve clarity |
| 13 | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | Adopt | Adopted in ADAPTE screening |
| 14 |
+ Yes |
- Don’t know |
+ Trivial |
- Very low |
+ No important uncertainty |
- Does not favour either the intervention or comparison |
+ Probably yes |
+ Yes |
Exclude | Excluded due to low-quality supporting evidence |
| 15 |
+ Yes |
+ Small |
? Small |
+ Low |
+ Probably no important uncertainty |
? Probably favours the intervention |
+ Probably yes |
+ Probably yes |
Adapt | Adapted intervention |
| 16 |
+ Yes |
+ Large |
+ Small |
+ Low |
+ Probably no important uncertainty |
+ Probably favours the intervention |
+ Yes |
+ Probably yes |
Adopt | Adopted in EtD assessment |
Note: +, panel agreed with original IWGDF judgement; -, panel disagreed with original IWGDF judgement; ?, panel unsure if agreed with original IWGDF judgement due to lack of IWGDF information on judgement; =, panel agreed with original IWGDF judgements during screening (see Table 1); QoE Quality of evidence