Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 5;22:275. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02298-9

Table 3.

Clinical evaluation of the sealants according to anatomic form, marginal adaptation, surface texture, marginal discoloration and secondary caries

Category Score Follow-up
1-Month 3-Month 6-Month 12-Month
Group 1
(Conceal F)
No. of teeth
Group 2
(BS)
No. of teeth
Group 1
(Conceal F)
No. of teeth
Group 2
(BS)
No. of teeth
Group 1
(Conceal F)
No. of teeth
Group 2
(BS)
No. of teeth
Group 1
(Conseal F)
No. of teeth
Group 2
(BS)
No. of teeth
Anatomic Form Alpha 42 12 31 6 27 3 23 1
Bravo 7 11 14 7 13 8 11 3
Charlie 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marginal Adaptation Alpha 41 12 30 5 26 2 22 0
Bravo 8 11 15 8 14 9 12 4
Charlie 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Surface Texture Alpha 48 19 41 11 35 9 31 1
Bravo 1 4 4 2 5 2 3 3
Charlie 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marginal Discoloration Alpha 49 23 45 13 39 10 33 3
Bravo 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
Charlie 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Secondary Caries Alpha 49 23 45 13 40 11 34 4
Charlie 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total number of teeth evaluated* 49 23 45 13 40 11 34 4

*If the loss of sealant was determined at the follow-up (retention score = charlie), the restoration could not be evaluated in terms of the other USPHS criteria