Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 28.
Published in final edited form as: Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Jun 28;31(3):31–39. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000296

Table 1:

Performance of C-DEF and U-Net models on BraTS cohort using limited training data

Mean Dice Similarity Coefficient [95% CI]

Model Enhancing Tumor Peritumoral Edema Necrotic/Non-enhancing Tumor
C-DEF-5 0.74 [0.72, 0.76] 0.81 [0.80, 0.83] 0.15 [0.13, 0.18]
U-Net-5 0.58 [0.56, 0.60] 0.55 [0.52, 0.57] 0.17 [0.15, 0.20]
C-DEF-10 0.72 [0.70, 0.74] 0.83 [0.81, 0.84] 0.17 [0.15, 0.20]
U-Net-10 0.70 [0.68, 0.72] 0.83 [0.82, 0.85] 0.28 [0.25, 0.31]
C-DEF-15 0.76 [0.74, 0.77] 0.85 [0.83, 0.86] 0.24 [0.22, 0.27]
U-Net-15 0.73 [0.71, 0.75] 0.82 [0.81, 0.84] 0.27 [0.24, 0.30]
C-DEF-20 0.76 [0.74, 0.78] 0.84 [0.82, 0.85] 0.21 [0.19, 0.24]
U-Net-20 0.77 [0.75, 0.79] 0.80 [0.79, 0.82] 0.28 [0.25, 0.31]
C-DEF-40 0.80 [0.78, 0.81] 0.85 [0.84, 0.87] 0.28 [0.25, 0.31]
U-Net-40 0.78 [0.77, 0.80] 0.85 [0.84, 0.87] 0.34 [0.31, 0.38]
C-DEF-80 0.81 [0.80, 0.83] 0.86 [0.85, 0.88] 0.32 [0.29, 0.36]
U-Net-80 0.81 [0.80, 0.83] 0.88 [0.86, 0.89] 0.48 [0.44, 0.52]
C-DEF-160 0.83 [0.82, 0.85] 0.87 [0.86, 0.89] 0.39 [0.36, 0.43]
U-NET-160 0.82 [0.81, 0.84] 0.89 [0.88, 0.91] 0.51 [0.47, 0.55]
C-DEF-Alla 0.83 [0.81, 0.84] 0.88 [0.86, 0.89] 0.43 [0.39, 0.46]
U-Net-Alla 0.83 [0.81, 0.84] 0.89 [0.88, 0.91] 0.51 [0.47, 0.55]
a

trained on data from 295 participants per fold