Skip to main content
. 2022 May 12;152(7):1763–1772. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac094

TABLE 5.

Prospective associations between adherence to the EAT–Lancet reference diet during adolescence measured by a DI score and anthropometric and cardiometabolic risk markers during young adulthood in 298 participants from the DONALD (Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinal Designed) study1

Tertiles of the DI score2
Risk markers3 n 4 β (95% CI)5 P value3,5 Tertile 1 Tertile 2 Tertile 3 P-trend3
BW, kg 298
 Model 1 0.97 (0.95, 0.98) <0.001 70.9 (68.3, 73.6) 70.4 (67.8, 73.1) 68.7 (66.2, 71.3) 0.480
 Model 2 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) 0.004 70.5 (67.9, 73.1) 70.5 (68.0, 73.1) 69.1 (66.6, 71.6) 0.659
 Model 3 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) 0.002 70.5 (67.3, 73.8) 69.4 (66.4, 72.7) 67.6 (64.6, 70.7) 0.117
BMI, kg/m2 298
 Model 1 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) <0.001 22.8 (22.2, 23.5) 22.4 (21.8, 23.0) 21.7 (21.1, 22.3) 0.045
  Model 2 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) 0.004 22.7 (22.1, 23.3) 22.4 (21.9, 23.0) 21.8 (21.3, 22.4) 0.104
  Model 3 0.99 (0.97, 0.99) 0.004 22.9 (22.0, 23.9) 22.5 (21.6, 23.5) 21.9 (20.9, 22.8) 0.030
FFMI, kg/m2 281
 Model 1 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) <0.001 17.1 (16.7, 17.6) 17.0 (16.5, 17.5) 17.0 (16.6, 17.5) 0.925
 Model 2 0.99 (0.99, 0.99) 0.039 17.1 (16.6, 17.6) 17.0 (16.6, 17.5) 17.1 (16.6, 17.5) 0.980
 Model 3 0.99 (0.99, 0.99) 0.034 16.9 (16.3, 17.5) 16.8 (16.2, 17.4) 16.6 (16.1, 17.2) 0.514
WC, cm 298
 Model 1 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) <0.001 77.1 (75.4, 78.8) 76.5 (74.8, 78.2) 75.1 (73.5, 76.8) 0.265
 Model 2 0.99 (0.98, 0.99) 0.025 76.7 (75.1, 78.4) 76.6 (74.9, 78.2) 75.4 (73.8, 76.9) 0.451
 Model 3 0.99 (0.98, 0.99) 0.022 77.1 (74.8, 79.4) 76.3 (74.1, 78.6) 74.9 (72.7, 77.1) 0.089
Body fat, % 281
 Model 1 1.01 (0.98, 1.04) 0.423 23.2 (21.5, 24.9) 22.1 (20.4, 23.9) 20.1 (18.6, 21.8) 0.040
 Model 2 0.98 (0.96, 0.99) 0.038 22.9 (21.3, 24.7) 22.2 (20.5, 23.9) 20.3 (18.8, 21.9) 0.071
 Model 3 0.98 (0.96, 0.99) 0.049 25.1 (22.6, 27.9) 24.2 (21.8, 26.8) 22.9 (20.6, 25.5) 0.149
FPG, mg/dL 296
 Model 1 0.99 (0.98, 1.00) 0.158 90.3 (88.3, 92.4) 92.9 (90.8, 95.0) 90.7 (88.7, 92.8) 0.176
 Model 2 0.99 (0.99, 1.00) 0.667 90.3 (88.3, 92.3) 92.9 (90.9, 95.1) 90.8 (88.8, 92.8) 0.166
 Model 3 0.99 (0.99, 1.01) 0.647 92.1 (88.9, 95.4) 94.7 (91.5, 98.1) 92.2 (89.0, 95.5) 0.138
Plasma total cholesterol, mg/dL 298
 Model 1 1.01 (0.99, 1.03) 0.197 162 (156, 169) 164 (158, 171) 158 (152, 164) 0.379
 Model 2 1.00 (0.99, 1.02) 0.70 161 (155, 167) 165 (158, 171) 159 (153, 165) 0.428
 Model 3 1.00 (0.99, 1.02) 0.747 161 (151, 171) 165 (155, 175) 160 (150, 170) 0.467
Plasma LDL cholesterol, mg/dL 292
 Model 1 1.01 (0.99, 1.04) 0.365 87.8 (82.6, 93.5) 88.1 (82.7, 93.8) 87.3 (82.1, 92.8) 0.979
 Model 2 1.01 (0.98, 1.03) 0.565 87.2 (82.0, 92.7) 88.2 (82.9, 93.9) 87.8 (82.7, 93.3) 0.967
 Model 3 1.01 (0.98, 1.03) 0.616 86.6 (78.6, 95.4) 87.6 (79.6, 96.5) 87.4 (79.4, 96.2) 0.981
Plasma HDL cholesterol, mg/dL 294
 Model 1 1.02 (1.00, 1.04) 0.029 55.6 (52.9, 58.4) 57.3 (54.6, 60.3) 54.5 (51.9, 57.2) 0.357
 Model 2 1.01 (0.99, 1.02) 0.561 55.5 (52.8, 58.2) 57.4 (54.6, 60.3) 54.6 (52.1, 57.4) 0.371
 Model 3 1.00 (0.99, 1.02) 0.676 56.4 (52.5, 60.6) 58.7 (54.7, 63.0) 56.5 (52.7, 60.7) 0.394
Plasma TGs, mg/dL 288
 Model 1 1.00 (0.97, 1.03) 0.899 82.6 (75.2, 90.8) 79.6 (72.5, 87.4) 80.4 (73.4, 88.1) 0.848
 Model 2 0.99 (0.96, 1.04) 0.954 82.4 (75.0, 90.6) 79.7 (72.5, 87.5) 80.6 (73.5, 88.3) 0.876
 Model 3 1.00 (0.96, 1.04) 0.999 76.5 (65.8, 89.0) 74.4 (64.2, 86.3) 74.9 (64.5, 86.8) 0.911
SBP, mm Hg 294
 Model 1 0.99 (0.99, 1.00) 0.204 114 (112, 116) 114 (112, 116) 115 (113, 117) 0.573
 Model 2 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) 0.877 114 (112, 116) 114 (112, 116) 115 (113, 117) 0.547
 Model 3 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) 0.925 114 (111, 117) 114 (111, 117) 115 (112, 118) 0.739
DBP, mm Hg 294
 Model 1 0.99 (0.99, 1.01) 0.467 73.1 (71.3, 74.9) 71.9 (70.2, 73.7) 73.8 (72.0, 75.6) 0.336
 Model 2 1.00 (0.99, 1.00) 0.962 72.9 (71.2, 74.7) 71.9 (70.2, 73.7) 73.9 (72.2, 75.7) 0.292
 Model 3 0.99 (0.98, 1.01) 0.873 73.2 (70.4, 75.9) 71.9 (69.2, 74.7) 73.7 (70.9, 76.6) 0.330
1

Values are adjusted mean estimates (95% CIs) obtained from linear regression unless otherwise indicated. BW, body weight; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DI, dietary index; FFMI, fat-free mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TG, triglyceride; WC, waist circumference.

2

Numbers of participants within each tertile of the DI score with available respective anthropometric and cardiometabolic risk markers are as follows: BW, BMI, WC, and plasma total cholesterol: n = 99, 98, and 101; FFMI and body fat: n = 96, 92, and 93; FPG: n = 98, 97, and 101; plasma LDL cholesterol: n = 98, 94, and 100; plasma HDL cholesterol: n = 99, 95, and 100; plasma TGs: n = 94, 95, and 99; SBP and DBP: n = 98, 96, and 100, for tertiles 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

3

Model 1 = crude; model 2 = adjusted for age and sex (continuous DI score only); model 3 = adjusted for age, sex (continuous DI score only), total energy intake, follow-up time, birth weight, pregnancy duration, parental school and higher education, and participant school and higher education.

4

Total number of participants with available anthropometric and cardiometabolic risk markers.

5

β estimates (95% CIs) from a linear model including the DI score as a continuous variable.