Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2019 Nov 19;66(1):100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.07.022

Table 5.

Cost-effectiveness results of multiple PrEP scenarios

PrEP scenario Coverage (%) Adherence Eligibility ICER ($/QALY) ICER ($/QALY) ICER ($/QALY)





All Black White All Black White Black White All

1 (base-case) 40 40 40 20.9%, 24.4%, 13.1%, 41.6%a Aged 16–18 and AI experienced 33,064 427,788 116,971
2 30 19 41 29,275 539,573 188,016
3 40 26 54 33,469 558,259 196,249
4 50 32 68 31,525 576,626 194,419
5 30 19 41 20.9%, 24.4%, 13.1%, 41.6% 30.9%, 18.7%, 18.7%, 31.7% 10.9%, 18.8%, 18.8%, 51.5% 33,616 473,581 184,166
6 40 26 54 41,637 466,783 192,680
7 50 32 68 45,274 512,706 204,084
8 40 40 40 20.9%, 24.4%, 13.1%, 41.6% Aged 16–18 and 10+ CAI in last 6 mo 17,008 372,306 91,782
9 30 19 41 10,461 456,654 148,477
10 40 26 54 15,411 485,126 159,256
11 50 32 68 14,488 513,673 160,067
12 30 19 41 20.9%, 24.4%, 13.1%, 41.6% 30.9%, 18.7%, 18.7%, 31.7% 10.9%, 18.8%, 18.8%, 51.5% 31,550 403,256 168,700
13 40 26 54 22,640 427,013 160,793
14 50 32 68 31,871 452,017 176,344

AI = anal intercourse; CAI = condomless anal intercourse; ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; PrEP = pre-exposure prophylaxis; QALY = quality-adjusted life years.

a

The cohort adherence included 20.9%, 24.4%, 13.1%, and 41.6% of PrEP users with no measurable adherence, low (<2 pills/wk), medium (2–3 pills/wk), and high adherence (>4 pills/wk), respectively.