Table 1.
Coding categories for reappraisal assessment type.
| Assessment type | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Self-report questionnaire | Closed- or open-response questions asking children/youth to report on their use of reappraisal, in general or in response to a particular kind of situation | Emotion regulation questionnaire (Gross and John, 2003), e.g., “I control my emotions by changing the way I think about the situation I'm in” |
| Parent-report questionnaire | Closed- or open-response questions asking parents to report on their child's use of reappraisal | Parent-rated emotion regulation questionnaire (Gunzenhauser et al., 2017) |
| Emotion regulation task with self-reported affect outcome | Direct assessment of the effect of instructions to use reappraisal, or self-reported use of reappraisal, on self-reported affective responses to emotion-eliciting stimuli or an emotion induction | Differences in self-reported negative affect after viewing affective images paired with instructions to reappraise versus “just look at” the image (e.g., McRae et al., 2012b) |
| Emotion regulation task with physiological/neural outcome | Direct assessment of the effect of instructions to use reappraisal, or self-reported use of reappraisal, on physiological or neural (fMRI or EEG) responses to emotion-eliciting stimuli or an emotion induction | Differences in fMRI activation patterns while viewing affective images paired with instructions to reappraise vs. “just look at” the image (e.g., McRae et al., 2012a) |
| Observation | Observer coding of participants' behavior and/or audible self-talk in either naturalistic or laboratory contexts | Coding of children's verbalizations during a laboratory-based disappointment task (e.g., Morris et al., 2011) |
| Vignette-based assessment | Questions about what the participant would do/think, or what someone should or could do/think, in specific hypothetical scenarios | Coding of children's suggestions for how the protagonists in situational vignettes could make a negative feeling “go away” (Davis et al., 2010) |
| Interview | Interview about what the participant does/thinks or did/thought, grounded in their lived experiences | Structured interview about youths' strategies for coping with stress (Shaunessy-Dedrick et al., 2015) |
| Experience sampling self-report | Closed- or open-response questions asking children/youth to report on their use of reappraisal, answered multiple times a day regarding their current or very recent experiences | Five times a day over two consecutive weeks, participants rate their current affect and their use of reappraisal since their previous response (Le Vigouroux et al., 2017) |
| Daily diary | Daily structured diaries in which youth report on what they experienced/did/thought that day | Daily diary of stressors experienced and coping strategies used over the last 24 h (Valiente et al., 2015) |