Comparison of sample preparation procedures and LOQs with different methodsa.
| Method/(ng mL−1) | Sample | Adsorbent | LOD (ng mL−1) | LOQ (ng mL−1) | Linear range (ng mL−1) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSPE-aptamer-ELISA | Pixian Douban | Aptamer@Fe3O4@SiO2–NH2 | 0.17 | 0.48 | 0.5–2 | Present work |
| ELISA | Pixian Douban | — | 0.41 | 1.26 | 0.5–2 | Comparison 1 |
| MSPE-aptamer-HPLC-MS/MS | Pixian Douban | Aptamer@Fe3O4@SiO2–NH2 | 0.07 | 0.22 | 0.5–10 | Comparison 2 |
| MSPE-UHPLC | Milk | PEG-MWCNTs-MNP | 0.01 | 0.03 | 1.25–40 | 30 |
| MSPE-HPLC | Vegetable oils | PDA@Fe3O4-MWCNTs | 0.20 | 0.60 | 1–50 | 31 |
| MSPD-HPLC | Crops | TBAC-hexyl alcohol DES | 0.10 | 0.33 | 0.1–100 | 32 |
Note: “-” means the sample preparation procedures without aptamer@Fe3O4@SiO2–NH2.