Table 1.
Basic characteristics, intervention measures, outcome indicators, and quality scores of the included literature.
Author | Year | Mean age (years) | Spinal anesthesia method | ONB anesthetic drugs and dose | Approach | Ultrasound guidance/nerve stimulator | Population (E/C) | Follow-up time (mo) | Outcome indicators | Jadad score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Doluoglu et al. [10] | 2021 | 64.6 ± 11.7 | Spinal block | 1% lidocaine 10 mL | Inguen | Neurostimulation | 61/62 | 32.3 ± 5.3 | ①②④⑤ | 4 |
| ||||||||||
Tekül et al. [11] | 2014 | 65.8 ± 7.8 | Spinal block | 0.25% levobupivacaine 10 mL | The pubic tubercle | Neurostimulation | 32/36 | 31.6 ± 5.9 | ⑤ | 4 |
| ||||||||||
Bolat et al. [12] | 2015 | 67.7 ± 10.5 | Spinal block | 0.25% levobupivacaine 10 mL | The pubic tubercle | Neurostimulation | 35/35 | N/A | ①② | 4 |
| ||||||||||
Khorrami et al. [13] | 2010 | 62 ± 11 | Spinal block | 1% lidocaine 10 mL | Inguen | Neurostimulation | 30/30 | N/A | ⑦ | 4 |
| ||||||||||
Erbay et al. [14] | 2017 | 69.2 (31–89) | Spinal block | 1% lidocaine 10 mL | Inguen | Neurostimulation | 47/49 | 36.3 ± 17.2 | ①②⑤⑥ | 3 |
| ||||||||||
Alavi et al. [15] | 2017 | 67 (50–79) | Spinal block | 1% lidocaine 10 mL | The pubic tubercle | Neurostimulation | 15/15 | N/A | ② | 4 |
| ||||||||||
Yu et al. [16] | 2021 | 61.45 ± 10.36 | Spinal epidural | 0.5% lidocaine 10 mL | Inguen | Ultrasound guidance | 45/45 | N/A | ①②③④ | 2 |
| ||||||||||
Wu et al. [17] | 2016 | 62.9 (28–84) | Spinal epidural | 1% lidocaine 10 mL | Inguen | Ultrasound guidance | 50/48 | 20.71 ± 12.32 | ①③④⑤ | 2 |
E: intervention group, C: control group; N/A: not available; ONB: Obturator nerve block. Outcomes: ①incidence of bladder perforation; ②incidence of obturator reflex; ③indwelling time of urinary catheter; ④length of hospital stay; ⑤tumor recurrence rate during follow-up; ⑥survival rate.