Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 29;2022:8490462. doi: 10.1155/2022/8490462

Table 1.

Basic characteristics, intervention measures, outcome indicators, and quality scores of the included literature.

Author Year Mean age (years) Spinal anesthesia method ONB anesthetic drugs and dose Approach Ultrasound guidance/nerve stimulator Population (E/C) Follow-up time (mo) Outcome indicators Jadad score
Doluoglu et al. [10] 2021 64.6 ± 11.7 Spinal block 1% lidocaine 10 mL Inguen Neurostimulation 61/62 32.3 ± 5.3 ①②④⑤ 4

Tekül et al. [11] 2014 65.8 ± 7.8 Spinal block 0.25% levobupivacaine 10 mL The pubic tubercle Neurostimulation 32/36 31.6 ± 5.9 4

Bolat et al. [12] 2015 67.7 ± 10.5 Spinal block 0.25% levobupivacaine 10 mL The pubic tubercle Neurostimulation 35/35 N/A ①② 4

Khorrami et al. [13] 2010 62 ± 11 Spinal block 1% lidocaine 10 mL Inguen Neurostimulation 30/30 N/A 4

Erbay et al. [14] 2017 69.2 (31–89) Spinal block 1% lidocaine 10 mL Inguen Neurostimulation 47/49 36.3 ± 17.2 ①②⑤⑥ 3

Alavi et al. [15] 2017 67 (50–79) Spinal block 1% lidocaine 10 mL The pubic tubercle Neurostimulation 15/15 N/A 4

Yu et al. [16] 2021 61.45 ± 10.36 Spinal epidural 0.5% lidocaine 10 mL Inguen Ultrasound guidance 45/45 N/A ①②③④ 2

Wu et al. [17] 2016 62.9 (28–84) Spinal epidural 1% lidocaine 10 mL Inguen Ultrasound guidance 50/48 20.71 ± 12.32 ①③④⑤ 2

E: intervention group, C: control group; N/A: not available; ONB: Obturator nerve block. Outcomes: ①incidence of bladder perforation; ②incidence of obturator reflex; ③indwelling time of urinary catheter; ④length of hospital stay; ⑤tumor recurrence rate during follow-up; ⑥survival rate.