Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 23;47(1):E67–E76. doi: 10.1503/jpn.210143

Table 2.

Between-group differences in fractional anisotropy and white matter volume in regions of interest*

Tract of interest Cluster size, voxels Mean value ± SD TFCE p value Cohen d MNI coordinates of peak voxel, x, y, z

PMDD Controls
Fractional anisotropy, PMDD > controls
 Left dorsal cingulum bundle 57 0.65 ± 0.06 0.61 ± 0.06 0.031 0.71 −9, −21, 33
 Right dorsal cingulum bundle 26 0.59 ± 0.03 0.54 ± 0.03 0.070 0.83 9, 9, 31
 Genu of the corpus callosum 15 0.69 ± 0.04 0.64 ± 0.04 0.095 0.87 −14, 30, 16
 Right superior longitudinal fasciculus 115 0.60 ± 0.03 0.57 ± 0.03 0.031 0.75 39, −10, 29
 Left uncinate fasciculus 30 0.58 ± 0.05 0.53 ± 0.04 0.024 0.69 −35, −1, −13
 Right uncinate fasciculus 12 0.62 ± 0.05 0.58 ± 0.05 0.081 0.67 34, 2, −12
White matter volume, PMDD > controls
 Right uncinate fasciculus 110 0.24 ± 0.05 0.22 ± 0.05 0.010 0.40 36, 0, −14

MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute; PMDD = premenstrual dysphoric disorder; SD = standard deviation; TFCE = threshold-free cluster enhancement.

*

Threshold-free cluster enhancement voxel-wise comparisons of fractional anisotropy and white matter volume between individuals with PMDD and healthy controls in tracts of interest.

Mean raw values of fractional anisotropy and white matter volume were extracted from significant clusters and are presented for each group. Results are corrected for multiple comparisons using the family-wise error rate at p < 0.1 across voxels.

q < 0.1, corrected for false discovery rate across regions of interest.